Re: [mpls] Alia Atlas' Yes on draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply-10: (with COMMENT)

Lizhong Jin <lizho.jin@gmail.com> Sun, 27 September 2015 06:53 UTC

Return-Path: <lizho.jin@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C70411A9128; Sat, 26 Sep 2015 23:53:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J48iB3nyvtSN; Sat, 26 Sep 2015 23:53:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x229.google.com (mail-wi0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE5FD1A9129; Sat, 26 Sep 2015 23:53:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wicgb1 with SMTP id gb1so66012163wic.1; Sat, 26 Sep 2015 23:53:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=CHXdVmWYbqPVqB+uH5SLe85yBZCkYDZT6TMZYQYgIQM=; b=exCEu4TTayZd5jVntztDQoN3yuVdYJKQBst4qlYxeWBTOX2SVqvJ6VBXC4egLZh1ey alMXbachpdMNoCrAjvKhFqwMUfNXQhzWPZZlPlHdg0emd2a29LJ2cGXsJhka0YxQUQdN MIAiWUKvf4ScGPdurtM/hOBty42IYeMk6Lgj6SpGEgQ2SDo0cExm/b7O6L5BXhRKrxSe zBjAK/VvawnL8jckp1cc0/z+RReSWwDZ4Z4Mi5Ar8OmNM98kb67LP7ZHLT1VwXaQRDSV jrzeliqgUX5Tq5SzCRw1nHr5MFKO5qq6RzWmNHLJJGRfYqo7T6MjbnA6WcRemj8tE+oA zXPw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.104.137 with SMTP id ge9mr14723749wjb.57.1443336826475; Sat, 26 Sep 2015 23:53:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.236.164 with HTTP; Sat, 26 Sep 2015 23:53:46 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2015 14:53:46 +0800
Message-ID: <CAH==cJyPCDpCkvWR4HzXAV-7=2_TFLBog8BLRczEXL5_q6y=EA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Lizhong Jin <lizho.jin@gmail.com>
To: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e010d8388d55c190520b50a12
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/IoVodeIMeQuDgIb7A-HKxwS_w0g>
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply <draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, mpls-chairs <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Alia Atlas' Yes on draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply-10: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2015 06:53:49 -0000

Hi Alia,
Thanks for the review. Your understanding is right, and will change
accordingly in the next version.

Regards
Lizhong

On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 2:26 AM, Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com> wrote:

> Alia Atlas has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply-10: Yes
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> 1) In Sec 2 above Figure 1 "1) Note that throughout the document,
> routable address means that it is
>    possible to route an IP packet to this address using the normal
>    information exchanged by the IGP operating in the AS."
>   Shouldn't that be "by the IGP and BGP (or EGP) operating in the AS"??
>
>
>