[mpls] addressing wgap comments on draft-zheng-mpls-lsp-ping-yang-cfg

Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Fri, 07 June 2019 09:25 UTC

Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF7DB1200D5; Fri, 7 Jun 2019 02:25:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oPRv0Ab0thYJ; Fri, 7 Jun 2019 02:25:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu []) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D289A12010D; Fri, 7 Jun 2019 02:25:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [] (unknown []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0D03F33F5AF; Fri, 7 Jun 2019 11:25:10 +0200 (CEST)
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
To: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "draft-zheng-mpls-lsp-ping-yang-cfg@ietf.org" <draft-zheng-mpls-lsp-ping-yang-cfg@ietf.org>
Cc: "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>, "t.petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com>, "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <6724024f-6264-71f6-fba1-5dc204400a38@pi.nu>
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2019 17:25:04 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/KkCcI_28nq-RS-VnTcHgpBoaG5I>
Subject: [mpls] addressing wgap comments on draft-zheng-mpls-lsp-ping-yang-cfg
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2019 09:25:21 -0000

Authors, reviewers and working group,

We did run a working group adoption poll on draft-zheng-mpls-lsp-ping-
yang-cfg in Feb/Mar, we received good comments.

After the authors had looked at the comments they came back and asked 
(paraphrase) "How much of this do we need to address before we can go
ahead and adopt the document"?

The working group chairs have discussed this and consulted the
reviewers and some other experts.

Our conclusion is that we should address all comments before re-starting
the wgap.

Please not that by "address" we mean that a response needs to be
available for each comments, but we do not prescribe what that answer
need to be, it could be for example:

- good catch, we'll update!
- we don't think the comment is correct, because of ...
- we believe that this comment is best addressed after the document
   has become a working group document
- or any variant on these themes

Loa, Nic, Tarek
mpls wg co-chairs


Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu
Senior MPLS Expert
Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64