Re: [mpls] [E] IPR poll on draft-sitaraman-mpls-rsvp-shared-labels

[Loa Andersson <[e-mail]>]

Working Group,

We goy this IPR statement, as far as I can it did not make it to the
mailing list. I've agreed with Tejal that it is OK if I forward it to
to list.

/Loa

On 2017-08-24 20:45, Parikh, Tejal wrote:
> No, I am not aware of any IPR that applies to draft-sitaraman-mpls-rsvp-shared- labels.
> 
> Thanks,
> Tejal
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Loa Andersson [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2017 4:03 AM
> To: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Subject: [E] IPR poll on draft-sitaraman-mpls-rsvp-shared-labels
> 
> 
> Working Group, authors,
> 
> The authors has indicated that the draft-sitaraman-mpls-rsvp-shared- labels are ready for working group adoption, prior to the wgap we need to do an IPR poll.
> 
> This mail starts this IPR poll.
> 
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-sitaraman-mpls-rsvp- shared-labels?
> 
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
> 
> There are three IPR disclosures against draft-sitaraman-mpls-rsvp- shared-labels.
> 
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the MPLS WG mailing list.* The document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and contributor.
> 
> If you are on the MPLS WG email list but are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
> 
> 
> /Loa
>    mpls wg co-chair
> 

-- 


Loa Andersson                        email: [e-mail]
Senior MPLS Expert                          [e-mail]
Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: [phone]