[mpls] Re: IPR poll for draft-deshmukh-mpls-frr-ext

[Vishnu Pavan Beeram <[e-mail]>]

Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft.
And yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules.

Regards,
-Pavan

On Tue, Jul 28, 2026 at 2:02 PM Tony Li <[e-mail]> wrote:

>
> [WG chair hat: on]
>
> Hi all,
>
> The authors of draft-deshmukh-mpls-frr-ext have requested WG adoption for
> their document. Before that happens, we need to do an IPR poll for the
> document.
>
> All authors and contributors to the document MUST reply-all to this email
> and respond with:
>
> "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
> or
> "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
>
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?
>
> If yes to the above, please state either:
>
> "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
> or
> "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
>
> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
> appropriate.
>
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
> above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
> aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
> stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
> contributor.
>
> If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
> as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
> the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
> aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
> participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
> undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
> and
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
>
> Thank you,
> Tony
>
>
>