Re: [mpls] IPR on draft-vkst-mpls-tp-oam-id-mib

Sami Boutros <sboutros@cisco.com> Fri, 01 June 2012 21:39 UTC

Return-Path: <sboutros@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 153E411E80F7 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 14:39:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.463
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.463 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, SARE_SUB_OBFU_OTHER=0.135]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7YcOUBMyacIT for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 14:39:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 564BF11E8097 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 14:39:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=sboutros@cisco.com; l=4150; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1338586784; x=1339796384; h=subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id: references:to; bh=sYlmCf24bik0vwXjA1nUzMGTNv6QzGH6RT7/hh6tYs0=; b=Ygc04yYkO43+KxuDWdLrCsB8D8aYMY/qNUKOyd08pBHxMiALAYUAC7n2 SCoWaGOqQ57AlVg0IuLOQj+Ax5oR79A/Uy89aBCRJ481T4c8WLepUnZe+ qZgJQe2Aqo+m7fHLboF7M0LwYKj3uWxCFCAiONuwQf8wHGYcZSgXUWRHu g=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EALk1yU+tJV2Z/2dsb2JhbABFtECBB4IYAQEBAwEBAQEPAQpRBgUFCwsEFC4nMAYTIodkBQuYIJ9cBIsPhRVgA4hAjFmOD4FmgwCBPw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.75,700,1330905600"; d="scan'208,217"; a="88805034"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 01 Jun 2012 21:39:44 +0000
Received: from xbh-rcd-301.cisco.com (xbh-rcd-301.cisco.com [72.163.63.8]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q51Ldhn3013194; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 21:39:43 GMT
Received: from xfe-rcd-101.cisco.com ([72.163.62.136]) by xbh-rcd-301.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 1 Jun 2012 16:39:43 -0500
Received: from rtp-vpn2-1019.cisco.com ([10.82.243.251]) by xfe-rcd-101.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 1 Jun 2012 16:39:43 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_4851F5C5-11E0-4A10-829D-2736564755C5"
From: Sami Boutros <sboutros@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHEV9L2WzfP=yrsVpZB5ow1ANDALaHt4Ya7W_FXasiP9_7wamw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 14:39:40 -0700
Message-Id: <F3CD3046-75B8-4470-90E3-D0C2268B2E3C@cisco.com>
References: <DF7F294AF4153D498141CBEFADB17704C70FE8EEE3@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net> <CAHEV9L2WzfP=yrsVpZB5ow1ANDALaHt4Ya7W_FXasiP9_7wamw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ping Pan <ping@pingpan.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Jun 2012 21:39:43.0623 (UTC) FILETIME=[0EA20970:01CD403F]
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, Thomas Nadeau <tnadeau@juniper.net>, "ppan@infinera.com" <ppan@infinera.com>, "venkat.mahalingams@gmail.com" <venkat.mahalingams@gmail.com>, Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net>
Subject: Re: [mpls] IPR on draft-vkst-mpls-tp-oam-id-mib
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 21:39:45 -0000

same here.

Sami
On Jun 1, 2012, at 1:37 PM, Ping Pan wrote:

> None that I am aware of. Thanks! Ping
> 
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 11:38 PM, Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net> wrote:
> Working Group and authors;
>  
> draft-vkst-mpls-tp-oam-id-mib is nearly ready to be called for
> potential WG adoption.
>  
> Before the call for adoption, we would like to check whether there is IPR
> on the document that needs to be disclosed.
>  
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-vkst-mpls-tp-oam-id-mib?
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
>  
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to
> this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant
> IPR. The documents will not advance to the next stage until a response
> has been received from each author and contributor.
>  
> If you are on the MPLS WG email list but are not listed as an author or
> contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any
> IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
>  
> Thanks, Ross
> (as MPLS WG co-chair)
>  
>  
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
> 
>