Re: [mpls] IPR poll draft-ietf-mpls-tp-psc-itu

[Eric Osborne <[e-mail]>]

I too am not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.



eric

On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 9:41 PM, Ryoo, Jeong-dong <[e-mail]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> No, I am not aware of any IPR that applies to this document.
>
> Jeong-dong
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From : "Loa Andersson" <[e-mail]>
> Sent : 2014-01-27 20:43:37 ( +09:00 )
> To : [e-mail] <[e-mail]>
> Cc : [e-mail] <[e-mail]>, VIGOUREUX,
> MARTIN (MARTIN) <[e-mail]>,
> [e-mail]
> <[e-mail]>
> Subject : IPR poll draft-ietf-mpls-tp-psc-itu
>
> Working Group,
>
> draft-ietf-mpls-tp-psc-itu is in working group last call, we have just
> received an IPR disclosure:
>
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls/current/msg11469.html
>
> This gives us reason to start an IPR poll on the document.
>
>
> This mail starts that IPR poll.
>
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-mpls-tp-psc-itu?
>
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
>
> Currently there is the one IPR disclosure, mentioned above, that
> relates to this document.
>
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to
> this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant
> IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the MPLS wg mailing list.* The
> document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been
> received from each author and contributor.
>
> If you are on the MPLS WG email list but are not listed as an author or
> contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any
> IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
>
> Thanks, Loa
> (as MPLS WG co-chair)
> --
>
>
> Loa Andersson email: [e-mail]
> Senior MPLS Expert [e-mail]
> Huawei Technologies (consultant) phone: [phone]
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>