[mpls] Pete Resnick's No Objection on charter-ietf-mpls-05-01: (with COMMENT)
"Pete Resnick" <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com> Tue, 13 August 2013 01:13 UTC
Return-Path: <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F293121F9F96; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 18:13:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EecvmsjS8PjX; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 18:13:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA89421F84DB; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 18:13:30 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.70.p1
Message-ID: <20130813011330.21644.1820.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 18:13:30 -0700
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 21:14:26 -0700
Cc: mpls@ietf.org, mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Subject: [mpls] Pete Resnick's No Objection on charter-ietf-mpls-05-01: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 01:13:39 -0000
Pete Resnick has entered the following ballot position for charter-ietf-mpls-05-01: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-mpls/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The responsibility includes..." What an odd construction. Can better words be chosen? - Maintain existing MPLS requirements, mechanisms, and protocols, in coordination with other working groups, e.g. CCAMP, PWE3 and OPSAWG working groups. I'm not sure what work item(s) you're talking about here. Is the WG updating existing requirements documents and/or protocol documents in response to new requirements from CCAMP, PWE3, and OPSAWG? Not clear from what's said what is being referred to. - Evolve key MPLS protocols, including LDP, tLDP, mLDP, RSVP-TE and LSP Ping to meet new requirements. Same question as above. "Evolve" is an odd word to choose, and I'm curious if the list of protocols is exhaustive. Please clarify. - Determine MPLS-specific aspects of traffic engineering for multi-areas/multi-AS in cooperation with the CCAMP WG Is there a reason this bullet changed from the previous version? It seems to have removed the "and document it" part. I'm not going to block this rechartering, but I would like to hear why the charter became (apparently) more mushy than it had been.
- [mpls] Pete Resnick's No Objection on charter-iet… Pete Resnick
- Re: [mpls] Pete Resnick's No Objection on charter… Adrian Farrel