[mpls] Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-mpls-sr-epe-oam-17
Tianran Zhou via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 08 July 2024 07:37 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietf.org
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from [10.244.2.22] (unknown [104.131.183.230]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69DEEC1D5305; Mon, 8 Jul 2024 00:37:30 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Tianran Zhou via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: ops-dir@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 12.17.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <172042425009.360868.226945649397586056@dt-datatracker-5f88556585-j5r2h>
Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2024 00:37:30 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: AMZEBJRSS5POJGUOPVV22L4DPUKH2YQY
X-Message-ID-Hash: AMZEBJRSS5POJGUOPVV22L4DPUKH2YQY
X-MailFrom: noreply@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-mpls.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: draft-ietf-mpls-sr-epe-oam.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Reply-To: Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
Subject: [mpls] Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-mpls-sr-epe-oam-17
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/OCds-D3LWI6Gv0GubngRGYnVKZM>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:mpls-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:mpls-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:mpls-leave@ietf.org>
Reviewer: Tianran Zhou Review result: Ready I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews during the IESG review. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. I reviewed the -15 version and made some comments. Thanks the authors for the revision. I think this version is ready for publication.
- [mpls] Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-mpls-… Tianran Zhou via Datatracker