Re: [mpls] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-mpls-mldp-yang-06

Tarek Saad <tsaad.net@gmail.com> Tue, 01 October 2019 19:27 UTC

Return-Path: <tsaad.net@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D56AB120043; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 12:27:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w1lbO1-1I64V; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 12:27:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x52c.google.com (mail-ed1-x52c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E10ED120018; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 12:27:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x52c.google.com with SMTP id h2so13066212edn.3; Tue, 01 Oct 2019 12:27:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:thread-topic:thread-index:date:message-id :references:in-reply-to:accept-language:content-language :mime-version; bh=7CqO5PkvDUuiiLe0xxuJMh7+4X4sEvKkfYNXNdx5NSE=; b=Zpi0Nzu8OUk/Mgysi0nQeTa5amnECneYEDketPMw1HzwqO0+aV3gJmk7LYGwWl1R2B /cE68NqqywPVSbuFPF5FTC2t6bmLv+fpVLPIbaUGgCBoiKX3MkxhW3jBNkvmbNs9ws92 9+GIVq6ZSD6LEEb0zdVmEkneBZvvSc+od7tNKnnvjgBusf0U5sF5Ey+iACuIiyPry6Ca L0ByKjNEMjTOgVJReEUo2iVZ0flDxE3YZfy+E6cJzkmr+BJxq8O515wz0IwYWC0mSb6W JGcNHSGl4Qy8VkvJzgsy9URNZw9zaeIdVGKBdgFnB/6/M7r3BonGXRYMhevqpB4Tjt6H Q7hw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:thread-topic:thread-index :date:message-id:references:in-reply-to:accept-language :content-language:mime-version; bh=7CqO5PkvDUuiiLe0xxuJMh7+4X4sEvKkfYNXNdx5NSE=; b=NUhKiWNG/PCxPaURvu4Zt6mWwmgD/ioglVWUytTTyI+FlE+kQZaiVgiQ7zhgisH1Li 7rWajyCI+x184k0moiZSg0rVL0CU90lMNFNGqHY0dshJGoJr0U7c6xxMBBK6g7kQgSxJ qjMxiEvMHSL6B/WieA9Z7tiSf+BEpQLoKvoNoZpLQvgKn+IeMy65bAC0+Ecd+guiaQ6C 0bt72M4sCr4PliPFBXHTITEywtCRSTDYRB0B3YPdK7zgtAIylPERfBH6fePbKdlqqNCP RYEX2SLd+DDYdi8YhIahUeP66j6k18sobnrATds7jrw1RIfs5LhghQUMJ42ozAlNTYuQ Wpqg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXlZxGrbMy1GzA4SIGVJ/6tqhviPDLI7fEP6FnwWLtn2FTbRXLQ fgVIR9e2veG3W6/COHlClco+JZt2
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyiCR0MApWknSt/WHn11Sstxn5EJ7zJKwDKzxAvHhV6+LAWL5KczN2CdfvoWezwBW/Uk4C53A==
X-Received: by 2002:a50:aa8e:: with SMTP id q14mr27779509edc.155.1569958058176; Tue, 01 Oct 2019 12:27:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DM6PR19MB3689.namprd19.prod.outlook.com ([2603:1036:301:21db::5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y14sm1954169ejb.20.2019.10.01.12.27.36 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 01 Oct 2019 12:27:37 -0700 (PDT)
From: Tarek Saad <tsaad.net@gmail.com>
To: "draft-ietf-mpls-mldp-yang@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-mldp-yang@ietf.org>
CC: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com>
Thread-Topic: WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-mpls-mldp-yang-06
Thread-Index: ATAzMjEz2+M9tDW9oYBv+t446mhBz8qKuCsi
X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1
Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2019 19:27:34 +0000
Message-ID: <DM6PR19MB368966709D9C935C88E7E7EAFC9D0@DM6PR19MB3689.namprd19.prod.outlook.com>
References: <BYAPR19MB3415A091AA3F8F229A1493FEFCB30@BYAPR19MB3415.namprd19.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BYAPR19MB3415A091AA3F8F229A1493FEFCB30@BYAPR19MB3415.namprd19.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SCL: -1
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-RecordReviewCfmType: 0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_DM6PR19MB368966709D9C935C88E7E7EAFC9D0DM6PR19MB3689namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/OHJ6tjLYxyEYqbzvJGT4wAYmdyA>
Subject: Re: [mpls] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-mpls-mldp-yang-06
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2019 19:27:42 -0000

This WGLC is now closed.
Authors,

There are comments that were received from Tom related to line length exceptions in the draft. Can those be addressed before we can proceed further?

Regards,
Tarek

From: Tarek Saad <tsaad.net@gmail.com>
Date: Friday, September 13, 2019 at 4:34 PM
To: "draft-ietf-mpls-mldp-yang@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-mldp-yang@ietf.org>
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-mpls-mldp-yang-06

Working Group,

This email starts WG Last Call, IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-mpls-mldp-yang-06. This WGLC ends on 9/27.
Please review the document and send any comments to the mpls wg mailing list (mpls@ietf.org<mailto:mpls@ietf.org>).

If you’re a co-author/contributor, please explicitly respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant undisclosed IPR.

If you're not a co-author/contributor, you need to respond only if you are aware of any relevant IPR not yet disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.

Currently there are no disclosed IPRs that can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?draft=draft-ietf-mpls-mldp-yang&submit=draft&rfc=&doctitle=&group=&holder=&iprtitle=&patent=

We are also polling for any existing implementation.

Regards,
Tarek (for the MPLS WG Chairs)