[mpls] I-D Action: draft-bonica-mpls-self-ping-06.txt
internet-drafts@ietf.org Mon, 18 May 2015 16:06 UTC
Return-Path: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA7651ACC8C; Mon, 18 May 2015 09:06:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YwpSM7VO7FfA; Mon, 18 May 2015 09:06:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DF6C1AC3F2; Mon, 18 May 2015 09:06:34 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.0.3
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20150518160634.28589.17837.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 09:06:34 -0700
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/OLHXpkgjtAwa_CuAJt7V2tP2ef0>
Cc: mpls@ietf.org
Subject: [mpls] I-D Action: draft-bonica-mpls-self-ping-06.txt
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 16:06:35 -0000
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Multiprotocol Label Switching Working Group of the IETF.
Title : LSP Self-Ping
Authors : Ravi Torvi
Ron Bonica
Ina Minei
Michael Conn
Dante Pacella
Luis Tomotaki
Mark Wygant
Filename : draft-bonica-mpls-self-ping-06.txt
Pages : 11
Date : 2015-05-18
Abstract:
When certain RSVP-TE optimizations are implemented, ingress LSRs can
receive RSVP RESV messages before forwarding state has been installed
on all downstream nodes. According to the RSVP-TE specification, the
ingress LSR can forward traffic through an LSP as soon as it receives
a RESV message. However, if the ingress LSR forwards traffic through
the LSP before forwarding state has been installed on all downstream
nodes, traffic can be lost.
This memo describes LSP Self-ping. When an ingress LSR receives an
RESV message, it can invoke LSP Self-ping procedures to ensure that
forwarding state has been installed on all downstream nodes.
LSP Self-ping is an extremely light-weight mechanism. It does not
consume control plane resources on transit or egress LSRs.
The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bonica-mpls-self-ping/
There's also a htmlized version available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bonica-mpls-self-ping-06
A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-bonica-mpls-self-ping-06
Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
- [mpls] I-D Action: draft-bonica-mpls-self-ping-06… internet-drafts