[mpls] 答复: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-mpls-mna-ioam-11 (Ends 2026-09-02)

[[e-mail]]

Hi Adrian and All,


I support progressing this draft to publication.


Best regards,
Xueyan









Original


From: AdrianFarrelviaDatatracker <[e-mail]>
  
To: [e-mail] <[e-mail]>;[e-mail] <[e-mail]>;[e-mail] <[e-mail]>;[e-mail] <[e-mail]>;
  
Date: 2026年08月20日 03:22
  
Subject: [mpls] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-mpls-mna-ioam-11 (Ends 2026-09-02)
  


We have all of the IPR response, so...
 
This message starts a WG Last Call for:
draft-ietf-mpls-mna-ioam-11
 
This Working Group Last Call ends on 2026-09-02
 
Abstract:
   In situ Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (IOAM), defined
   in RFC 9197, collects operational and telemetry information in the
   packet using IOAM-Data-Fields while the packet traverses a path
   between two points in the network.  Several IOAM Option-Types are
   available, for example, Pre-allocated Trace, Proof of Transit (POT),
   Edge-to-Edge (E2E), and Incremental Trace, that can be used to
   collect information for calculating various performance metrics.  RFC
   9326 defines the IOAM Direct Export (IOAM-DEX) Option-Type, which is
   used as a trigger for IOAM data to be directly exported or locally
   aggregated without being pushed into in-flight data packets.
 
   MPLS Network Actions (MNA) techniques indicate actions to be
   performed on any combination of Label Switched Paths, MPLS packets,
   and the node itself, and to transport data needed for these actions.
   This document employs the MNA mechanisms to collect and transport the
   operational state and telemetry information using IOAM-Data-Fields as
   well as IOAM-DEX.
 
File can be retrieved from:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-mpls-mna-ioam-11.txt
 
Please review and indicate your support or objection to proceed with the
publication of this document by replying to this email keeping [e-mail]
in copy. Objections should be explained and suggestions to resolve them are
highly appreciated.
 
Authors, and WG participants in general, are reminded of the Intellectual
Property Rights (IPR) disclosure obligations described in BCP 79 [1].
Appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the provisions
of BCP 78 [1] and BCP 79 [2] must be filed, if you are aware of any.
Sanctions available for application to violators of IETF IPR Policy can be
found at [3].
 
Thank you.
 
[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp78/
[2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp79/
[3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6701/
 
The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-mna-ioam/
 
There is also an HTML version available at:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-mpls-mna-ioam-11.html
 
A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-mpls-mna-ioam-11
 
_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list -- [e-mail]
To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]