Re: [mpls] [RTG-DIR] RtgDir review: draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-udp-return-path-04.txt

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Tue, 10 November 2015 12:32 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69E0C1AC3BE; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 04:32:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LE7BTU-Azyyx; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 04:32:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (asmtp3.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.159]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E7F81AC3B9; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 04:32:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id tAACWarb026007; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 12:32:36 GMT
Received: from 950129200 ([27.38.4.176]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id tAACWLrP025736 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 10 Nov 2015 12:32:29 GMT
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: stbryant@cisco.com, 'Daniele Ceccarelli' <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>, rtg-ads@tools.ietf.org
References: <4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE4812ACA49E@ESESSMB301.ericsson.se> <5640D43D.5090603@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <5640D43D.5090603@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 12:32:07 -0000
Message-ID: <031a01d11bb3$dff6bb80$9fe43280$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQGxc8UG+JXSnw9vKwEGDRxJ8tXARAFbmaocnsmidiA=
Content-Language: en-gb
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1679-8.0.0.1202-21932.007
X-TM-AS-Result: No-2.990-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No-2.990-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: 5+1rHnqhWUQ4HKI/yaqRm/p1plqEbuqxKloE0QYN6MISbGfYBjCAMvke KF7cZWNJcRMU/6zQP6iE8eev+nXtzMFeWQ9rEC3V4t2mucDkRBEZskwWqoib3D0cwODY7JTpo8W MkQWv6iWY/fxzcM2LJMce5dMCYKFd3QfwsVk0UbuZ/dgf3Hl0lcjC9feAoLkjG3RfY8H/HNWrr8 YiFy8uHiG5nk91h/u+YbJlYaFeS1bfmX8j0EVgesityBAn05NxSlf5ugIkOUSGsFDsuOejCwkCn kA3h/n1D701dfVAizuSL9OvtUca/e6+D482nHhriTSgm8kJVKRDDKa3G4nrLQ==
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/RIqBFnh4QpAoY7sAc_Mf0oLgVpU>
Cc: rtg-dir@ietf.org, draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-udp-return-path.all@tools.ietf.org, mpls@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mpls] [RTG-DIR] RtgDir review: draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-udp-return-path-04.txt
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 12:32:44 -0000

>> • Section 3: My understanding is that if multiple URO are sent but the responder is
>>   configured to send a single reply, it replies to the first URO. Is any error message
>>   foreseen for this?
>
> Actually I wonder if this should be the first URO that it is able to respond to.

Yes, I like this formulation which I interpret to mean: process them in order and use the first one in the list that it is able to use.

"Able" is perhaps suspect and subject to policy, but presumably the sender is happy for any URO in the list to be used, and all we are doing is expressing an ordered preference.
 
Adrian