Re: [mpls] working group adoption poll

"Nagendra Kumar Nainar (naikumar)" <naikumar@cisco.com> Wed, 27 February 2019 13:23 UTC

Return-Path: <naikumar@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62D12130EC0; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 05:23:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qlicfdoe4S9T; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 05:23:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4AABF130EBE; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 05:23:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2058; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1551273807; x=1552483407; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=2dvucyMANaLMLOPtSUdRWQwjgMxde2JoruQOzzJo1pQ=; b=hLFnddN9Z8OO41zQB64ki1+bbWPmrzcCzabXa9PVPxvzuUsJm66PVO1x pm2GwuCK+k0kOg6sdKpHG1hHPpsZCxwvMLosYArG8L75Hq/aRBSy/KttY /Js16Q1pn21lkkNJoFclAhZb4Qw7S3Fz1SWzgkEAEboOm6xrUDSA7wq5U M=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0AHAACjjnZc/5ldJa1kGgEBAQEBAgE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEHAgEBAQGBUgQBAQEBCwGCA4FqJwqDfq4jFIFnCwEBhGwCF4N1IjUIDQE?= =?us-ascii?q?DAQECAQECbSiFSwYjETcDCw4CAgEIGgImAgICGRcVEAIEAQ0FgyCBc6scgS+?= =?us-ascii?q?KLwWBBos9F4F/gREnH4JMhE4BEgEfF4JzMYImAow8ly4JApJoGYFzhV+LSop?= =?us-ascii?q?dkhcCERSBKCECNGVxcBU7KgGCQZBdQTGQDYEfgR8BAQ?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.58,419,1544486400"; d="scan'208";a="525426825"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 Feb 2019 13:23:25 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-015.cisco.com (xch-aln-015.cisco.com [173.36.7.25]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x1RDNPZZ011854 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 27 Feb 2019 13:23:26 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-015.cisco.com (173.37.102.25) by XCH-ALN-015.cisco.com (173.36.7.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 07:23:25 -0600
Received: from xch-rcd-015.cisco.com ([173.37.102.25]) by XCH-RCD-015.cisco.com ([173.37.102.25]) with mapi id 15.00.1395.000; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 07:23:25 -0600
From: "Nagendra Kumar Nainar (naikumar)" <naikumar@cisco.com>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
CC: "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-nainar-mpls-rfc8287-len-clarification@ietf.org" <draft-nainar-mpls-rfc8287-len-clarification@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: working group adoption poll
Thread-Index: AQHUzng12E9+RdmILkyw7SrRtAhh1KXzsw+A
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 13:23:25 +0000
Message-ID: <A932FDFE-E902-4F4B-8AA3-A2224E1DC62D@cisco.com>
References: <19124c2d-c53b-5826-e7fa-b16616e7ef01@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <19124c2d-c53b-5826-e7fa-b16616e7ef01@pi.nu>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.a.0.180210
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.118.20.8]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <523632293000444DA9B8C01D1B7396EA@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.25, xch-aln-015.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-2.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/SC63nAFiPt1U1m_QWDZWo5Wntg8>
Subject: Re: [mpls] working group adoption poll
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 13:23:30 -0000

Hi Loa,

Support as co-author.

Regards,
Nagendra

On 2/27/19, 3:41 AM, "Loa Andersson" <loa@pi.nu> wrote:

    Working Group,
    
    This is to start a two week poll on adopting
    draft-nainar-mpls-rfc8287-len-clarification
    as a MPLS working group document.
    
    Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working
    group mailing list (mpls@ietf.org). Please give a technical
    motivation for your support/not support, especially if you think that
    the document should not be adopted as a working group document.
    
    We have done an IPR poll for this document. All the co-authors and
    contributors have responded to the IPR poll that they are unaware of any
    IPRs that relates to this draft.
    
    There are no IPR disclosures against this document.
    
    There has also been a discussion on adding text at the end of section 4
    that says:
    
    “The Figures in Sections 4.1, 4.2, and 4.3 replace the corresponding
    Figures in RFC 8029  Sections 5.1, 5.2, and 5.3 respectively. The
    updated figures contain explicitly defined length.”
    
    There has also been an agreement to add this after the adoption.
    
    The working group adoption poll ends March 10, 2019.
    
    /Loa
    
    mpls wg co-chair
    -- 
    
    
    Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu
    Senior MPLS Expert
    Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64