Re: [mpls] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-entropy-lsp-ping-04: (with COMMENT)

"Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com> Thu, 01 September 2016 17:11 UTC

Return-Path: <cpignata@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAAE012DAC9; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 10:11:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.069
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.069 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KYf6qnk3iyY2; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 10:11:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-3.cisco.com (alln-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.142.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1122F12DAC2; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 10:11:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1934; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1472749900; x=1473959500; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=nrkSrLtXhi39U26XCG/p3wWbKCfPgrusFy6qyvtE2Jg=; b=JWj5LIUCuAY0YO4nui4c5ZiHkWyPKYqt2yuOAMPmQ/Yr81c2iHuzC229 ru0DS0tXMIsYM86D80BPGa/Xh6F1YaLOg52myZcEXz9Zpg/wf0B6DjG7L 0A1//rLU/0CZw4dMP+uwhBvIniWQKDXf1OdYZQaWGSEGyVIYIF8MMCpYn 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AjAgD8YMhX/5NdJa1dg1ABAQEBAR5XfAezZYI1gg+CAiSFeAIcgTQ4FAECAQEBAQEBAV4nhGEBAQQBIxFFBQsCAQgOCgICJgICAjAVBQsCBA4FiEAIDq4XjG8BAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEXBYEFhSqBeAiCTYQSEQEcgwIrgi8FiC2RIwGGH4kRgW2EXYkNjEiDeAEeNoJ8gTVwAYRMgSB/AQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.30,268,1470700800"; d="scan'208";a="317615300"
Received: from rcdn-core-11.cisco.com ([173.37.93.147]) by alln-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Sep 2016 17:11:39 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-018.cisco.com (xch-rtp-018.cisco.com [64.101.220.158]) by rcdn-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u81HBcde007477 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 1 Sep 2016 17:11:39 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-020.cisco.com (64.101.220.160) by XCH-RTP-018.cisco.com (64.101.220.158) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 13:11:38 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-020.cisco.com ([64.101.220.160]) by XCH-RTP-020.cisco.com ([64.101.220.160]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 13:11:38 -0400
From: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>
To: Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
Thread-Topic: Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-entropy-lsp-ping-04: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHSA724qNOq9fykE0GLtBG6YWw+ZaBlI16A
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2016 17:11:37 +0000
Message-ID: <737A319F-0EBD-4389-BC6F-4774D66FCB40@cisco.com>
References: <147267164863.31842.8974579017546915912.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <147267164863.31842.8974579017546915912.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.117.115.53]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <D126300826DF4F4CB3C39671B4579EC7@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/TLwT0y1YUH1kLOiscQkgB0cKQi4>
Cc: "draft-ietf-mpls-entropy-lsp-ping@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-entropy-lsp-ping@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, mpls-chairs <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-entropy-lsp-ping-04: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2016 17:11:42 -0000

Thanks, Mirja. Agreed, this passage could be clearer.

Benoit flagged this as well as part of Scott Bradner’s Ops-dir review, and we just sent in a proposed change.

— Carlos.

> On Aug 31, 2016, at 3:27 PM, Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net> wrote:
> 
> Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-mpls-entropy-lsp-ping-04: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-entropy-lsp-ping/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> As Scott mentioned in his review, I also think that the following
> sentence needs more discussion:
> 
> "All LSRs along the LSP need to be able to understand the new flags
>   and the new multipath information type."
> 
> How can you ever know if this is true? Isn't the whole problem that you
> don't know what different LSRs implement?
> 
>