[mpls] Re: draft-ietf-mpls-mna-nrp-selector-03 ietf last call Opsdir review

[Tony Li <[e-mail]>]

Hi Xiao,

Thank you for your review.

Tony



> On Apr 3, 2026, at 1:17 AM, Xiao Min via Datatracker - noreply at ietf.org <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-mpls-mna-nrp-selector
> Title: MPLS Network Actions for Network Resource Partition Selector
> Reviewer: Xiao Min
> Review result: Has Nits
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I have been selected as the Operational Directorate (opsdir) reviewer for this
> Internet-Draft.
> 
> The Operational Directorate reviews all operational and management-related
> Internet-Drafts to ensure alignment with operational best practices and that
> adequate operational considerations are covered.
> 
> A complete set of _"Guidelines for Considering Operations and Management in
> IETF Specifications"_ can be found at
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-rfc5706bis/.
> 
> While these comments are primarily for the Operations and Management Area
> Directors (Ops ADs), the authors should consider them alongside other feedback
> received.
> 
> - Document: draft-ietf-mpls-mna-nrp-selector-03
> 
> - Reviewer: Xiao Min
> 
> - Review Date: Apr 3, 2026
> 
> - Intended Status: Standards Track
> 
> ---
> 
> ## Summary
> 
> Has Nits: This document is basically ready for publication but has nits that
> should be considered prior to publication.
> 
> ## General Operational Comments Alignment with RFC 5706bis
> 
> This document defines three in-stack MPLS Network Actions for NRP Selector used
> for network slicing.
> 
> This document has contained an individual "Deployment Considerations" section
> which IMHO can be treated as operational considerations.
> 
> ## Major Issues
> 
> None.
> 
> ## Minor Issues
> 
> None.
> 
> ## Nits
> 
> Abstract, s/The NRP Selector is used to map the packet to the associated NRP
> and provide/The NRP Selector is used to map the packet to the associated NRP
> and provides.
> 
> Abstract, suggest changing "This document discusses a few options" to "This
> document specifies a few options" because this document is on standards track.
> 
> Section 1, s/The reader is expected to be familiar with terminology/The reader
> is expected to be familiar with terminologies.
> 
> Section 1, [I-D.ietf-mpls-mna-fwk] has been published so the reference should
> be changed to [RFC9789].
> 
>