Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-tp-linear-protection-mib

Kingston Smiler <kingstonsmiler@gmail.com> Tue, 15 March 2016 14:41 UTC

Return-Path: <kingstonsmiler@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9098D12DA87; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 07:41:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5yD-HbZwakNX; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 07:41:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ig0-x22e.google.com (mail-ig0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15CB312DC27; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 07:41:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ig0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id mh10so17178550igb.0; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 07:41:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=ayfDVoi909AhC3RxJQeTHna21cglAfXurDWYlkOlLlk=; b=aKKlB06yV74mLhQ4hFw5EIY0uNe0jHraZLqXiD/hyA8evpd/O7u69bWVAzuv1HEQse ffmaqgbCNcJs1VbZKdS2siIokyvVnzjCTo7Jf9fywvuVO5P/UqtCMCVjt8w5crl3UWCn XWIMZQNp364Kgp+XNqcaglpcjFPEooBvQgnMGnwyiFTvjY/0T4k6j6MGMZ7X7MD1al0/ 0VUQioGkQ8MnBS3CNuaISyTCRQUwULXRKYVgeO6a1vSvzUgY19MtFNbZgisEGNaV91Kp GkuzsDX+TFO5D026UbVuLVcpy+fMjr2vjLMQuJzRVz/mN1nc0ZA+12kTj/+ejXDJbWYL ScsQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=ayfDVoi909AhC3RxJQeTHna21cglAfXurDWYlkOlLlk=; b=TeOa4Q27f2qM3N/CuGHzhXjY437aYtQJQ/D49EPE4E10d5VpPd5HHp1QQQXAOvEP61 l2tQqbM8ZyoxD3ZNgsuUEGg9ddkxfnO1NZgPlhcKjwSz3OULjJLGPGsXZBcT5Kt+4C1Q 3eJ+3RnedrO9wkhPTb/d4C2J3JmM6a6fnz8o2T09t+Ufu744lxq4AjtdgZKzRY/hwZ1k kUJJOoQqJ9gO2oh1kQIf/b136Vr/cvjGlWaF/+zTBkZVm35hWrDhI5qQVIyFRA78LynJ UH4nQm6tewHfnZynz31Y2umdBp/SIa2c7066Is8mCDJsWjNxs2Ba+P9QZ81nU8JGqvtC 2r5Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJIbKmym953RXCHR/jWgFGAl1h4Anpwsv8myUWQiH/G5Q5MDDt2JPrcsDmHMGQe4Wo7tpTHi3JzD0Fq6Uw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.43.168 with SMTP id x8mr24679435igl.92.1458052897472; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 07:41:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.79.37.210 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 07:41:37 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <56E6DD2F.7090000@pi.nu>
References: <56E6DD2F.7090000@pi.nu>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 20:11:37 +0530
Message-ID: <CAM4Z69QOOYkMNnpkJes6jTqpkodt3nF5ZcPPh_G1bik-Wq3S_g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Kingston Smiler <kingstonsmiler@gmail.com>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01184ac2048df0052e176551
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/YqcMFsXrjDi7tg5zrqzy2JqyUJE>
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-mpls-tp-linear-protection-mib@ietf.org, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-tp-linear-protection-mib
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 14:41:54 -0000

I'm not aware of any IPR related to this draft.

Regards,
S. Kingston Smiler


On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 9:17 PM, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> wrote:

> Working Group,
>
> The authors of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-linear-protection-mib has told us that
> the document is ready to be considered for working group last call.
>
> We will start an IPR poll prior to the start of the wglc.
>
> This mail starts the IPR poll.
>
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to
> draft-ietf-mpls-tp-linear-protection-mib?
>
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
>
> There are no IPR disclosures filed directly against this document.
>
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to
> this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant
> IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the MPLS wg mailing list.* The
> document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been
> received from each author and contributor.
>
> If you are on the MPLS WG email list but are not listed as an author or
> contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any
> IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
>
>
> /Loa
> mpls wg co-chair
> --
>
>
> Loa Andersson                        email: loa@mail01.huawei.com
> Senior MPLS Expert                          loa@pi.nu
> Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: +46 739 81 21 64
>