[mpls] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-sfc-05: (with COMMENT)

Datatracker on behalf of Mirja Kühlewind <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org> Wed, 06 March 2019 15:58 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietf.org
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 164F5127287; Wed, 6 Mar 2019 07:58:07 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Datatracker on behalf of Mirja Kühlewind <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-sfc@ietf.org, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, mpls-chairs@ietf.org, loa@pi.nu, mpls@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.93.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <155188788708.5267.7389555320597491610.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2019 07:58:07 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/bh6jksL1gdY4xU-q_hpZuQg6jHs>
Subject: [mpls] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-sfc-05: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2019 15:58:07 -0000

Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-mpls-sfc-05: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-sfc/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

One minor editorial comment:
The abstract is quite long (compared to usual RFC abstracts). I recommend to
only have the last paragraph (or a slightly extended version of the last
paragraph).