[mpls] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification-01.txt

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Tue, 27 October 2020 00:55 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA6B03A1134 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 17:55:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3ktg-6VgWnSo for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 17:55:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22c.google.com (mail-lj1-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A403E3A1001 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 17:55:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22c.google.com with SMTP id m16so12775375ljo.6 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 17:55:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=C2pzIyUAM//X55cJM4RHq5UHfG4z7dEyVw9P8864wgc=; b=u+6V5hU/Ssexd8G466hJyl3JH+gfs4BjZrbkegwm8meFxUy8G6EOSOqEub0qL+FJId IOzKIdMP1rUBx95n2i1RtF0yw23OkJXwSPWOxfV2prGwukipbZ4Z9n9Ne9vmEhV7ezWy nIXMy3OMxP3SSrLT8L4ItAe2d2gvMQyyS1yPksVRDwk819rLKWWCC4qxItieZ5VrQ5EI 8JgI2HmPQGRx1q/HFhpEVtQCgEOyozmk0qvA2uAyMH5+9zQFMH/Bi4wZQu/l0WWNEa2U f6pRL4MjRGanojY8aUqS3YhGRyR+uNBzGykO/YpXYF7x90BCkXmniD2CS6s7Ka0LjjMp m3lQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=C2pzIyUAM//X55cJM4RHq5UHfG4z7dEyVw9P8864wgc=; b=EGKNCUZ0ej5WYH5Gys1mzQGqwvmd1OBmZ1I4yXhVNsiz6fT2xUwz+97XTHrtmUdpfb yZhLYj5eOK72kmB6B6mTznTYmsYPmjnxShd13aml8tkJveQ9HtZySEFrTTMiP2rG9yrt oBcJ4vr0oij3G7r8xh3TQzehWIERaXt6HEu9CZb0uoM9eesZTRTtk+AiGaz4jOpPwr3m loeWmO8yBQ8diuwy6n+uiW8oPzH1LrjeyPNjg2mVMlO6N6/rjqj7BMiKnxiAwAN29+OB BKhP+QaqnClEFttDfN8E8thMWeaq8lGorjU3RJpiqA6ERXUw1+h9Fo6hBDERRbIJc1PW Z/JQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530L37gGYKtUI5fVoxfuO9d+nApgp2LQDmFzAKPwz32gTZ/ZgskL u52aMYPdPZcu9uJ9C+58RHD8gUQTje/56R+Fm/YbZKB2
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzkXUjG/EMgEC3LLGbBndvm6DGvCn1+duB9XjdULRXU6C+AsUMZy5AigGK3QpKaub6AZSR2LJWEs6SRd5ct2XE=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9657:: with SMTP id z23mr7375294ljh.8.1603760111382; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 17:55:11 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <160363611190.22997.1047697548733839217@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <160363611190.22997.1047697548733839217@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 17:55:00 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmUGMUaW5p86rv6WrwNEjCqcz4G74OOZXaPbeo_Oih20Lw@mail.gmail.com>
To: mpls <mpls@ietf.org>, Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>, John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net>, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000be738f05b29c7f8e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/ccRVIS4KTZX3EXXlhjftFsQF4Ns>
Subject: [mpls] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification-01.txt
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 00:55:16 -0000

Dear All,
updates in the new version are to address comments and suggestions from Loa
(many thanks!). Also, we've investigated how the active OAM would work in
SFC-MPLS (SFC with MPLS forwarding plane) and proposed the solution using
G-ACh and GAL,
Much appreciate your comments, questions, and suggestions.

Regards,
Yao and Greg

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
Date: Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 7:28 AM
Subject: New Version Notification for
draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification-01.txt
To: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>, Liu Yao <liu.yao71@zte.com.cn>



A new version of I-D, draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification-01.txt
has been successfully submitted by Liu Yao and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name:           draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification
Revision:       01
Title:          MPLS-based Service Function Path(SFP) Consistency
Verification
Document date:  2020-10-25
Group:          Individual Submission
Pages:          14
URL:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification-01.txt
Status:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification/
Htmlized:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification
Htmlized:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification-01
Diff:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification-01

Abstract:
   This document proposes a method to verify the correlation between
   Service Function Chaining control and/or management plane view of the
   specified Service Function Path and the state of its data.  It works
   for both SR service programming and MPLS-based NSH SFC.

   This document defines the signaling of the Generic Associated Channel
   (G-ACh) over a Service Function Path (SFP) with an MPLS forwarding
   plane using the basic unit defined in RFC 8595.  The document also
   describes the processing of the G-ACh by the elements of the SFP.




Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat