[mpls] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-rosetta-stone-10.txt
Huub van Helvoort <huubatwork@gmail.com> Tue, 12 February 2013 21:20 UTC
Return-Path: <huubatwork@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC0C921F8C50 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 13:20:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.158
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.158 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.441, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_PBL=0.905, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL=0.877, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lfBXydZYxZrl for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 13:20:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-we0-x229.google.com (we-in-x0229.1e100.net [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9F1421F8C4F for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 13:20:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-we0-f169.google.com with SMTP id t11so476842wey.28 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 13:20:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:disposition-notification-to:date:from :reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-forwarded-message-id:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=huURY+UHKmMPurX8MK1QrSw4YO5fFW4CmaA37iPHhjo=; b=EeHgUPvteLPRwjoAqUcGfEv/BCYNkWInKD3Hi9fje72GUCKWs2GrwV9O0p8lmfdg3x SYxccq9xgfxh5NPkgZZUppc/Cnexsf7yGp6vRcyuLpfgT/g8uI2DfHqtnOzVnms/ooxB 59C/NLSuK4hMGW+SYzkA+hh+8BGWDXVOcc3Zutlsa9UKSzbL0ynX1GsIXne/LgGW9yWz J0R1Bkfr1srLngFB1tcJzIJz1k7M2bZR+UFTsoItVlWOOr39gRC6SNEJlee0aonMDaYW 1F7S0wEm5TR5VstxiXtcD4ccoShsOrhDY8jMjqhyTT89QWxgnWeW4VhhIfnuAdSEz6a5 e0IQ==
X-Received: by 10.180.81.164 with SMTP id b4mr5946520wiy.34.1360704005012; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 13:20:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from McAsterix.local (g215085.upc-g.chello.nl. [80.57.215.85]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id cu7sm39023392wib.8.2013.02.12.13.20.03 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 12 Feb 2013 13:20:04 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <511AB204.60607@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 22:20:04 +0100
From: Huub van Helvoort <huubatwork@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "t.petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com>
References: <20130212205042.21102.28859.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20130212205042.21102.28859.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <20130212205042.21102.28859.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [mpls] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-rosetta-stone-10.txt
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: huubatwork@gmail.com
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 21:20:21 -0000
Hello Tom, I have uploaded draft-ietf-mpls-tp-rosetta-stone-10 after addressing your comments. > My big comment is that I would like all the entries in section 3 > in alphabetic order. Technically, it makes no difference but to > the user, I think it would be a big improvement. Done. > At the moment, it is like turning to an English dictionary that is > divided into sections and needing to know whether a word derives > from Greek or Arabic, Sanskrit or Chinese, in order to know which > section it is in. The fact that the first half is in alphabetic > order just makes it harder to use - if the ordering were seemingly > random, it would be less of a problem! In a few places I made sub sections to group some of the definitions of terms that have a relation. > Lesser comments. > > PST and SPME have made it into significant MPLS-TP RFC and will > be there for ever. I would like (deprecated) entries for these > in this. Done. > 3.12 CE is not expanded anywhere Done. > 3.16 spurious period after the reference Fixed. > 3.43 an MEG??? Depends on how you pronounce MEG... - an emm eee gee - a "meg" I used the latter > 3.43 et seq. The various ME entries lack any references; since > ME seems to me to have been the most troublesome aspect of MPLS-TP > and one that still leads to errors, such as the erroneous expansion > of MEP, I think that these entries above all need references. References are added. > 3.45 This is a comprehensive entry and yet ... TCM is not > expanded anywhere - I think it deserves an entry of its own. Done. > Statements like > "A MEP terminates all the OAM packets that it receives" > makes me think 'from where?' do I really understand this? Added "source" and "sink" to provide clarity. > while > "MPLS-TP MEP notifies a fault indication" > seems odd in highlighting just one aspect of a MEP's functionality; > again, why that? Reworded. > 5 Operations and Management (OAM) > I love it - could we push for this usage to be adopted across the > IETF :-) I am sorry to disappoint you, I followed RFC6291 (for obvious reasons). > I would like a reference for this section - there are a number of OAM > RFC to choose from, e.g. framework, analysis, requirements. Done. > 6 I would like a reference for this section, perhaps the just-WGLC'd > draft-ietf-mpls-tp-security-framework Done. > 9 I do like alphabetic order, for references as well (a comment I saw > recently from a GenArt reviewer). Done. > Overall, it remains an impressive piece of work. Thank you, much appreciated. Cheers, Huub. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [mpls] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-rosetta-stone-10.txt Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 12:50:42 -0800 From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org CC: mpls@ietf.org A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Multiprotocol Label Switching Working Group of the IETF. Title : A Thesaurus for the Terminology used in Multiprotocol Label Switching Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) drafts/RFCs and ITU-T's Transport Network Recommendations. Author(s) : Huub van Helvoort Loa Andersson Nurit Sprecher Filename : draft-ietf-mpls-tp-rosetta-stone-10.txt Pages : 20 Date : 2013-02-12 Abstract: MPLS-TP is based on a profile of the MPLS and PW procedures as specified in the MPLS-TE and (MS-)PW architectures developed by the IETF. The ITU-T has specified a Transport Network architecture. This document provides a thesaurus for the interpretation of MPLS-TP terminology within the context of the ITU-T Transport Network recommendations. It is important to note that MPLS-TP is applicable in a wider set of contexts than just Transport Networks. The definitions presented in this document do not provide exclusive nor complete interpretations of MPLS-TP concepts. This document simply allows the MPLS-TP terms to be applied within the Transport Network context. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-tp-rosetta-stone There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mpls-tp-rosetta-stone-10 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-mpls-tp-rosetta-stone-10 Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ _______________________________________________ mpls mailing list mpls@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
- [mpls] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-rosetta-sto… internet-drafts
- [mpls] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-rosett… Huub van Helvoort
- Re: [mpls] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-rosetta… t.petch