[mpls] Another comment to draft-ietf-mpls-tp-oam-id-mib-02

Muly Ilan <muly_i@rad.com> Thu, 14 February 2013 16:04 UTC

Return-Path: <muly_i@rad.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 434CE21F8630 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 08:04:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.500, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 64+27utWfpJK for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 08:04:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rad.co.il (mailrelay01-q.rad.co.il [80.74.100.150]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E9A921F8534 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 08:03:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Internal Mail-Server by MailRelay01 (envelope-from muly?i@rad.com) with AES128-SHA encrypted SMTP; 14 Feb 2013 18:06:20 +0200
Received: from EXRAD5.ad.rad.co.il ([192.114.24.28]) by EXRAD5.ad.rad.co.il ([192.114.24.28]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.004; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 18:03:56 +0200
From: Muly Ilan <muly_i@rad.com>
To: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, Venkatesan Mahalingam <venkat.mahalingams@gmail.com>, "aldrin.ietf@gmail.com" <aldrin.ietf@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: Another comment to draft-ietf-mpls-tp-oam-id-mib-02
Thread-Index: Ac4KzOOIqjVoETjoTbqVayXIIEIBvw==
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 16:03:55 +0000
Message-ID: <32CB7A1F0806AB4688CE3F22C29DAC870493882B@EXRAD5.ad.rad.co.il>
Accept-Language: en-AU, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.17.170.136]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_32CB7A1F0806AB4688CE3F22C29DAC870493882BEXRAD5adradcoil_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Commtouch-Refid: str=0001.0A0C0203.511D0AED.0041,ss=1,fgs=0
Subject: [mpls] Another comment to draft-ietf-mpls-tp-oam-id-mib-02
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 16:04:03 -0000

Hi,

More than one proactive OAM session may be simultaneously activated over the same MEP. For example, CC-CV and PM (loss measurement and/or delay measurement).
But in the mplsOamIdMeTable there's a pointer to only one session - mplsOamIdMeProactiveOamSessIndex.

Instead of mplsOamIdMeProactiveOamSessIndex I suggest to define a new table that will list all the proactive OAM sessions per MEP.
There are other alternatives but I think an additional table is the straightforward solution.

Regards,

Muly