Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-mpls-p2mp-sig-requirement-02.txt - concluded

Loa Andersson <loa@pi.se> Mon, 13 June 2005 12:39 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DhoED-0005ll-DJ; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 08:39:45 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DhoDZ-0005dk-Tj for mpls@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 08:39:05 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA06345 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 08:39:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [80.86.78.228] (helo=smtp.testbed.se) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1DhoZq-0002tM-BU for mpls@ietf.org; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 09:02:07 -0400
Received: from p5499fd9d.dip.t-dialin.net ([84.153.253.157] helo=[192.168.2.109]) by fw.testbed.se with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.43) id 1DhoDD-0005PM-H4; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 14:38:46 +0200
Message-ID: <42AD7E51.4040409@pi.se>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 14:38:41 +0200
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.se>
Organization: Acreo AB
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.7) Gecko/20050414
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Seisho Yasukawa <yasukawa.seisho@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-mpls-p2mp-sig-requirement-02.txt - concluded
References: <Your message of "Tue, 07 Jun 2005 15:56:08 +0900." <6.0.0.20.2.20050607155256.03a3ce68@imc.m.ecl.ntt.co.jp> <5.0.2.5.2.20050613211326.08bbed80@imc.m.ecl.ntt.co.jp>
In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.5.2.20050613211326.08bbed80@imc.m.ecl.ntt.co.jp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 6cca30437e2d04f45110f2ff8dc1b1d5
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: mpls@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: mpls@lists.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.lists.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@lists.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: mpls-bounces@lists.ietf.org
Errors-To: mpls-bounces@lists.ietf.org

Seisho,

thansk for taking care of this - and a little bit late this
is to announce that the working group last call on
draft-ietf-mpls-p2mp-sig-requirement-02.txt has ended.

The draft authors should take care of the comments and send
the responses together with an updated vesion to mailing list.

/Loa


Seisho Yasukawa wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Even though we originally intended that it would be
> nice to accomplish partial make-before-break
> with changing some identifier which only related to
> changing portion of the tree and without changing
> identifier which related to rest of unchanged portion
> of the tree, I agree this is a little bit over-specified requirement.
> 
> We will relax the requirement a little bit.
> 
> Thank you for your useful suggestion.
> 
> Regards,
> Seisho
> 
> 
> At 14:47 05/06/10 -0400, George Swallow wrote:
> 
> 
>> >   The solution SHOULD allow for make-before-break re-optimization of
>> >   any subdivision of the P2MP LSP (S2L sub-tree, S2X sub-LSP, S2L
>> >   sub-LSP, X2L sub-tree, B2L sub-tree, X2L tree, or B2L tree) with no
>> >   impact on the rest of the P2MP LSP (no label reallocation, no change
>> >   in identifiers, etc.).
>>
>> Clearly in order to do make-before-break, some ID has to change.  And in
>> most cases the message that initiates the change will have to pass
>> through some nodes that aren't affected by the change.  So the
>> requirement seems to be a bit over-specified.
>>
>> I'm glad it's just a *SHOULD*.  It would be nice if you could say which
>> identifiers, but as were trying to be protocol neutral, that's a bit
>> difficult.
>>
>> Perhaps a more abstract requirement should be made?  Such as:
>>
>> >   The solution SHOULD allow for make-before-break re-optimization of
>> >   any subdivision of the P2MP LSP (S2L sub-tree, S2X sub-LSP, S2L
>> >   sub-LSP, X2L sub-tree, B2L sub-tree, X2L tree, or B2L tree).
>> >   Further is SHOULD do so minimizing the signalling impact on the rest
>> >   of the P2MP LSP and without affecting the ability of the management
>> >   plane to the LSP.
>>
>> ...George
>>
>>
>> ========================================================================
>> George Swallow             Cisco Systems                  (978) 936-1398
>>                            1414 Massachusetts Avenue
>>                            Boxborough, MA 01719
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Loa Andersson

Principal Networking Architect
Acreo AB                           phone:  +46 8 632 77 14
Isafjordsgatan 22                  mobile: +46 739 81 21 64
Kista, Sweden                      email:  loa.andersson@acreo.se
                                            loa@pi.se

_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls