[mpls] [Errata Verified] RFC6512 (6754)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 31 May 2023 17:58 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF658C151555; Wed, 31 May 2023 10:58:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.948
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.948 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5DwY0gTZrDuf; Wed, 31 May 2023 10:58:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FEC1C151072; Wed, 31 May 2023 10:58:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id E157F7FDDB; Wed, 31 May 2023 10:58:29 -0700 (PDT)
To: bert.van.ael@nomios.be, ice@cisco.com, erosen@cisco.com, mnapierala@att.com, n.leymann@telekom.de
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: james.n.guichard@futurewei.com, iesg@ietf.org, mpls@ietf.org, iana@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20230531175829.E157F7FDDB@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 10:58:29 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/eLm38pk2RluBf1liZVRFG0NkN4E>
Subject: [mpls] [Errata Verified] RFC6512 (6754)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 17:58:34 -0000
The following errata report has been verified for RFC6512, "Using Multipoint LDP When the Backbone Has No Route to the Root". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6754 -------------------------------------- Status: Verified Type: Technical Reported by: Bert Van Ael <bert.van.ael@nomios.be> Date Reported: 2021-11-25 Verified by: James N Guichard (IESG) Section: 3.2.1 Original Text ------------- PE1 also has this Inter-AS I-PMSI A-D route. Corrected Text -------------- PE1 also has this Intra-AS I-PMSI A-D route. Notes ----- "PE1 also has this route" refers to "Although ASBR1 does not have a route to PE2, it does have a BGP Intra-AS Inclusive PMSI (I-PMSI) auto-discovery (A-D) route". Intra-AS mechanisms are used for auto-discovery/binding for Non-Segmented Inter-AS Tunnels. -------------------------------------- RFC6512 (draft-ietf-mpls-mldp-recurs-fec-04) -------------------------------------- Title : Using Multipoint LDP When the Backbone Has No Route to the Root Publication Date : February 2012 Author(s) : IJ. Wijnands, E. Rosen, M. Napierala, N. Leymann Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Multiprotocol Label Switching Area : Routing Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [mpls] [Errata Verified] RFC6512 (6754) RFC Errata System