[mpls] draft-atlas-mpls-te-express-path: MPLS-TE or GMPLS

Gregory Mirsky <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com> Tue, 26 February 2013 02:47 UTC

Return-Path: <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C376821E80F4; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 18:47:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.448
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.448 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UnuHdmjmFW6n; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 18:47:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from usevmg20.ericsson.net (usevmg20.ericsson.net [198.24.6.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C58721E80B3; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 18:47:46 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c618062d-b7f0d6d00000097e-23-512c2252bfc5
Received: from EUSAAHC003.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [147.117.188.81]) by usevmg20.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id A7.E8.02430.2522C215; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 03:47:46 +0100 (CET)
Received: from EUSAAMB103.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.120]) by EUSAAHC003.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.81]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 21:47:45 -0500
From: Gregory Mirsky <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com>
To: Alia Atlas <akatlas@juniper.net>, John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net>, David Ward <dward@cisco.com>, "sprevidi@cisco.com" <sprevidi@cisco.com>, "cfilsfil@cisco.com" <cfilsfil@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: draft-atlas-mpls-te-express-path: MPLS-TE or GMPLS
Thread-Index: Ac4Ty6cyMNdo2diLT9SLS+k42w2zdA==
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 02:47:44 +0000
Message-ID: <7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF11206AA75@eusaamb103.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [147.117.188.135]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF11206AA75eusaamb103ericsso_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrFLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyuXRPoG6Qkk6gQd9PFYuv19Isnsy5wWKx c3YPm8WBDd8YLebcdba4tXQlq8X63Y+YHNg9pvzeyOqxZMlPJo/rTVfZA5ijuGxSUnMyy1KL 9O0SuDJOTdjLVHCVp2JKxxnWBsbfXF2MnBwSAiYS3xYcYIawxSQu3FvP1sXIxSEkcIRR4uuC flYIZzmjxPwZj9lBqtgEjCRebOxhB0mICBxklJh7/hFQFQcHs4CbxOk3aSA1wgLWEosf7war FxFwkFi54jCUrSdx4NhNFhCbRUBV4vu3M2CbeQW8JZ61rgSzGYGu+H5qDROIzSwgLnHryXwm iOsEJJbsOQ91qajEy8f/WCFsZYnvcx6xQNTnS0xZeYUVYqagxMmZT1gmMArPQjJqFpKyWUjK IOJ6EjemTmGDsLUlli18zQxh60rM+HeIBVl8ASP7KkaO0uLUstx0I4NNjMD4OibBpruDcc9L y0OM0hwsSuK8Qa4XAoQE0hNLUrNTUwtSi+KLSnNSiw8xMnFwSjUwMm/+t+FSRahu/cozHSvO 73yzc16paJviB/f6FYz5Rb590wq3tCmG3tx+9tOKF86r4p9Ouv6jxP3GgxlL69nMnK4rsnZ+ jH9fonvpzabZ8k8vbP6aqJpxqOte6632kslifXoqvqfUTzPmnDTbkFZw/ilH38aukGC5TTdm lZlnWKhdk2zeu8E3SomlOCPRUIu5qDgRAMv4iMp9AgAA
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Subject: [mpls] draft-atlas-mpls-te-express-path: MPLS-TE or GMPLS
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 02:47:47 -0000

Dear Authors, et al.,
I've got perhaps naïve question:
*       Would GMPLS model rather than MPLS-TE be more advantageous for this work?

Hence I'm cross-posting even though it is not, mildly speaking, encouraged.

        Regards,
                Greg