IETF Logo Mail Archive

[mpls] Correction - MPLS wg WGLC on draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-sfl

Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Wed, 01 July 2020 07:09 UTC

Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E3E23A08FF; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 00:09:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KT1t-9kesoNG; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 00:09:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDB6C3A08FB; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 00:09:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.15] (unknown [122.2.100.221]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4F4C83245D8; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 09:09:16 +0200 (CEST)
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
To: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Cc: "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-sfl@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-sfl@ietf.org>
References: <280d1472-877c-f1f7-6ea0-6459b05798e2@pi.nu>
Message-ID: <f5f0327d-978c-60cf-a0be-326db64a68b5@pi.nu>
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2020 15:09:10 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <280d1472-877c-f1f7-6ea0-6459b05798e2@pi.nu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/erb6teeR7ef1g4ORk_6mq8n9sCI>
Subject: [mpls] Correction - MPLS wg WGLC on draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-sfl
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2020 07:09:25 -0000

WG,

The was a copy and past error in the first mail, please respond to this
mail.

/Loa

On 01/07/2020 13:14, Loa Andersson wrote:
> Working Group,
> 
> This is to initiate a two week working group last call on
> draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-sfl.
> 
> Please send your comments to the mpls wg mailing list (mpls@ietf.org).
> 
> There are three IPR disclosures against draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-sfl, though
> disclosure #2991 is an update of disclosure #2706ö
> 
> We lack responses on the IPR poll, we normally wit for responses from
> all authors and contributors. However the IPR poll has been open
> since May 29 and we have decided to go ahead and start the wglc
> anyway.
> 
> If you have concerns du to lack of responses to the IPR poll, please
> send those comments as part of the wglc.
> 
> Of the authors four has responded to the IPR poll. Of two contributors
> one has responded to the IPR poll. All responses have been posted to
> the working group mailing list, indicating that the respondents are
> unaware of any non-disclosed IPRs that relates to this document.
> 
> This working group last call ends Friday July 15, 2020.
> 
> /Loa

-- 

Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu
Senior MPLS Expert                          loa.pi.nu@gmail
Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email