IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7697 (4586)

Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Sat, 09 January 2016 07:26 UTC

Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE43A1A1B1B for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 23:26:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ltOXwa9S6Wpl for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 23:26:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AF0C1A1B18 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 23:26:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.13] (unknown [49.149.205.178]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C88F018013CB; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 08:26:40 +0100 (CET)
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, none@rfc-editor.org, aldrin.ietf@gmail.com, venkat.mahalingams@gmail.com, kannankvs@gmail.com, tnadeau@lucidvision.com, sboutros@vmware.com, akatlas@gmail.com, db3546@att.com, aretana@cisco.com, swallow@cisco.com, rcallon@juniper.net
References: <20160109071729.A4DC0180206@rfc-editor.org>
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Message-ID: <5690B629.7030306@pi.nu>
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2016 15:26:33 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20160109071729.A4DC0180206@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/gRPBqtFc9JMicHtMTip62MirowQ>
Cc: mpls@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mpls] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7697 (4586)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2016 07:26:51 -0000

Deborah,

The nature of this is such that I don't we need to much process to
approve it. As the wg chair I support this. If you are OK with it
just go ahead and approve.

/Loa

On 2016-01-09 15:17, RFC Errata System wrote:
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7697,
> "MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) Identifiers Management Information Base (MIB)".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7697&eid=4586
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Venkatesan Mahalingam <venkat.mahalingams@gmail.com>
>
> Section: 9.1
>
> Original Text
> -------------
> 9.1.  IANA Considerations for MPLS-OAM-ID-STD-MIB
>
>     IANA has to assign the OID { mplsStdMIB 21 } to the
>     MPLS-OAM-ID-STD-MIB module specified in this document.
>
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> 9.1.  IANA Considerations for MPLS-OAM-ID-STD-MIB
>
>     IANA has assigned the OID { mplsStdMIB 21 } to the
>     MPLS-OAM-ID-STD-MIB module specified in this document.
>
>
> Notes
> -----
>
>
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC7697 (draft-ietf-mpls-tp-oam-id-mib-11)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) Identifiers Management Information Base (MIB)
> Publication Date    : January 2016
> Author(s)           : P. Pan, S. Aldrin, M. Venkatesan, K. Sampath, T. Nadeau, S. Boutros
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Multiprotocol Label Switching
> Area                : Routing
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email