[mpls] qn on RFC 6428
Bala Venkata <balavenkata@aim.com> Wed, 29 February 2012 06:45 UTC
Return-Path: <balavenkata@aim.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6234921E804E for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 22:45:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.602
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.602 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_44=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AOSymbhhNTLz for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 22:45:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from imr-da03.mx.aol.com (imr-da03.mx.aol.com [205.188.105.145]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C97521E8043 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 22:45:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mtaomg-ma04.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtaomg-ma04.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.41.11]) by imr-da03.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q1T6jrg6003458 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 01:45:53 -0500
Received: from core-mra002b.r1000.mail.aol.com (core-mra002.r1000.mail.aol.com [172.29.194.69]) by mtaomg-ma04.r1000.mx.aol.com (OMAG/Core Interface) with ESMTP id D76F3E000088 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 01:45:52 -0500 (EST)
References: <mailman.1871.1326864992.3200.mpls@ietf.org>
To: mpls@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <mailman.1871.1326864992.3200.mpls@ietf.org>
X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Bala Venkata <balavenkata@aim.com>
X-MB-Message-Type: User
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--------MB_8CEC4C4EA33C8DB_9B4_1B98D_webmail-m055.sysops.aol.com"
X-Mailer: AOL Webmail 35647-STANDARD
Received: from 115.249.191.100 by webmail-m055.sysops.aol.com (64.12.158.155) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Wed, 29 Feb 2012 01:45:52 -0500
Message-Id: <8CEC4C4EA068E5C-9B4-6CF1@webmail-m055.sysops.aol.com>
X-Originating-IP: [115.249.191.100]
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 01:45:52 -0500
x-aol-global-disposition: G
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20110426; t=1330497952; bh=+CVNc4HrbyYvjSVWAKpCyxBmkQDlTFVOMGJ937hSiGQ=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Cu/EVruj6CeBdPQb26yPRg7+9y6gsD4p1Czm1x/tf+8jMU0KkFyAXOcqUwGydBtme J3FBX7B3FxLi0+P8S0m/A8Ji8WOqHuNdodap7QXMstqCcKiEBcAuRhKEQeY3jHU0l7 7WGLwB6eKmu4n3oiwfmeyLsEH17KgzH99SLLl/c8=
X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 1:2:400164352:93952408
X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 1
x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d290b4f4dc9a06bfb
Subject: [mpls] qn on RFC 6428
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 06:45:59 -0000
HI Dave,Greg, John & others- What's the response for the following query on RFC 6428: Re: [mpls] Maintenance Entity definition for MPLS-TP: a discrepancy between RFC 6371 and draft-ietf-mpls-rosetta-stone, I'm interested in knowing about " explicit linkage between the type of the monitored bi-directional LSP (co-routed or associated) and the number of MEs associated with the LSP in RFC 6428 " Thanks ! /bala
- [mpls] qn on RFC 6428 Bala Venkata
- Re: [mpls] qn on RFC 6428 David Allan I