Re: [mpls] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5654 (1953)

Hi folks,

IMHO, the original text had one '(' AND one ')' too many.
The corrected text as shown in the NEXT email below
removes only the second of these extra parentheses.
The first one should also be removed. The Erratum
"corrected" Corrected Text should [IMHO] read:

 Corrected Text
 --------------
 Investment in equipment and facilities Capital Expenditure
    (CAPEX) and Operational Expenditure (OPEX) should be minimized.

With thanks, from Chris Benson.

On Wed, 2 Dec 2009, RFC Errata System wrote:

>>  Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 19:01:13 -0800 (PST)
>>  From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
>>  To:  <benjamin.niven-jenkins@bt.com>,  <dbrungard@att.com>,
>>      <malcolm.betts@huawei.com>,  <nurit.sprecher@nsn.com>,
>>      <satoshi.ueno@ntt.com>,  <rcallon@juniper.net>,
>>      <adrian.farrel@huawei.com>,  <swallow@cisco.com>,  <loa@pi.nu>
>>  Cc:  <mpls@ietf.org>,  <duzongpeng@gmail.com>,  <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
>>  Subject: [mpls] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5654 (1953)
>>  
>>  
>>  The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5654,
>>  "Requirements of an MPLS Transport Profile".
>>  
>>  --------------------------------------
>>  You may review the report below and at:
>>  http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5654&eid=1953
>>  
>>  --------------------------------------
>>  Type: Editorial
>>  Reported by: Zongpeng Du <duzongpeng@gmail.com>
>>  
>>  Section: 1
>>  
>>  Original Text
>>  -------------
>>  Investment in equipment and facilities (Capital Expenditure
>>     (CAPEX)) and Operational Expenditure (OPEX) should be minimized.
>>  
>>  
>>  Corrected Text
>>  --------------
>>  Investment in equipment and facilities (Capital Expenditure
>>     (CAPEX) and Operational Expenditure (OPEX) should be minimized.
>>  
>>  
>>  Notes
>>  -----
>>  An unnecessary parenthesis.
>>  
>>  Instructions:
>>  -------------
>>  This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
>>  use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
>>  rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
>>  can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
>>  
>>  --------------------------------------
>>  RFC5654 (draft-ietf-mpls-tp-requirements-10)
>>  --------------------------------------
>>  Title               : Requirements of an MPLS Transport Profile
>>  Publication Date    : September 2009
>>  Author(s)           : B. Niven-Jenkins, Ed., D. Brungard, Ed., M. Betts, Ed., N. Sprecher, S. Ueno
>>  Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
>>  Source              : Multiprotocol Label Switching
>>  Area                : Routing
>>  Stream              : IETF
>>  Verifying Party     : IESG
>>  _______________________________________________
>>  mpls mailing list
>>  mpls@ietf.org
>>  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>>  