IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] New draft for performing lsp-traceroute fortunneled/stitched LSPs.

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Mon, 09 July 2007 21:57 UTC

Return-path: <mpls-bounces@lists.ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I81EA-0002V3-5W; Mon, 09 Jul 2007 17:57:06 -0400
Received: from mpls by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1I81E9-0002Uy-9s for mpls-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 09 Jul 2007 17:57:05 -0400
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I81E8-0002Up-Vm for mpls@ietf.org; Mon, 09 Jul 2007 17:57:05 -0400
Received: from mta1.iomartmail.com ([62.128.193.151]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I81E8-0003FH-J5 for mpls@ietf.org; Mon, 09 Jul 2007 17:57:04 -0400
Received: from mta1.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mta1.iomartmail.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l69LtPNJ027817; Mon, 9 Jul 2007 22:55:25 +0100
Received: from your029b8cecfe (dsl-sp-81-140-15-32.in-addr.broadbandscope.com [81.140.15.32]) (authenticated bits=0) by mta1.iomartmail.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l69LtNOb027717; Mon, 9 Jul 2007 22:55:25 +0100
Message-ID: <053201c7c273$d8bbc380$0200a8c0@your029b8cecfe>
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: Nitin Bahadur <nitinb@juniper.net>, mpls@ietf.org
References: <7FA0C743C38E5340BFC2873488FA1E8E1F074F@emailcorp3.jnpr.net>
Subject: Re: [mpls] New draft for performing lsp-traceroute fortunneled/stitched LSPs.
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 22:51:58 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type="original"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: a7d6aff76b15f3f56fcb94490e1052e4
Cc:
X-BeenThere: mpls@lists.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.lists.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@lists.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: mpls-bounces@lists.ietf.org

Hi,

Could you briefly compare and contrast with RFC 3609?

Thanks,
Adrian
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Nitin Bahadur" <nitinb@juniper.net>
To: <mpls@ietf.org>
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 7:08 PM
Subject: [mpls] New draft for performing lsp-traceroute fortunneled/stitched 
LSPs.



Hi,

 A new draft has been submitted...

http://tools.ietf.org/wg/mpls/draft-nitinb-lsp-ping-over-mpls-tunnel-00.
txt

The draft describes methods for performing lsp-ping traceroute over mpls
tunnels.  The techniques outlined in RFC 4379 (LSP-Ping) fail to perform
correct traceroute validation and path discovery for a LSP that goes
over other mpls tunnels or over stitched LSPs. The draft describes new
procedures that can be used in conjunction with the standard procedures
described in RFC 4379 to trace such LSPs.

It would be great if the WG could go over the draft and provide comments
on the same.

Thanks
Nitin


_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls




_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email