Re: [mpls] Last call on tidying up Expired MPLS WG I-Ds

[Loa Andersson <[e-mail]>]

MPLS chairs,

I did a very similar effort early 2019

https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/B709FmCy6mpn8IcDoQQXhxI7j1k/

and got very few answers. I have not checked the two list against each 
other, but they should (at least prior to 2019) be very similar.

One thing that we discovered was that there were some missing "replaces" 
or "replaced by" that we corrected, if anyone have the energy that 
should be checked again- If documents gone ahead and become RFC we don't 
want to lose the roots.

There are a few draft that I think we should keep:

draft-ietf-mpls-mldp-yang
-------------------------

MLDP is deployed so I guess the YANG model is needed. I'm a co-author, 
but I don't feel comfortable to do this on my own, if there is someone 
with better YANH competence than me I will help.

draft-ietf-mpls-static-yang
---------------------------

I believe this is an operational case, and the the spec is needed.

draft-ietf-mpls-framework
-------------------------

I would like to point out that there was a conscious decission to let 
this document expire among the authors. I was a bit involved, we did 
drive framework. architecture and LDP targeting to get them to IESG at 
the same time, we only succeeded moderately.

If someone want to to work on this, I would be happy to contribute.

/Loa





On 2023-12-05 18:39, Adrian Farrel wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> The working group has 27 working group I-Ds that have Expired. Some of these
> are very old (1998), while others only expired a couple of years ago.
> 
> To keep things tidy, we want to mark the ones that have been given up as
> "Dead". Dead does not mean that work cannot be re-started, but it does
> require that the idea is brought back as an individual draft and carried
> through the process as normal.
> 
> This email starts a two week last call (ends December 20th) to allow anyone
> to request that one of these I-Ds is not made Dead. A reason would be nice,
> along with a promise to actually do some work!
> 
> The I-Ds can be seen at https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/mpls/documents/ and
> are listed below for convenience.
> 
> Cheers,
> Adrian (for the chairs)
> 
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-mldp-yang-10
> YANG Data Model for MPLS mLDP
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-static-yang-13
> A YANG Data Model for MPLS Static LSPs
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-rmr-extensions-03
> LDP Extensions for RMR
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-rmr-multicast-00
> Resilient MPLS Rings and Multicast
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-mldp-mib-05
> Definitions of Managed Objects for the LDP Point-to-Multipoint and
> Multipoint-to-Multipoint Label Switched Paths
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-opportunistic-encrypt-03
> Opportunistic Security in MPLS Networks
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-tp-mfp-use-case-and-require
> ments-03
> Use Cases and Requirements for MPLS-TP multi-failure protection
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-pdutta-mpls-tldp-hello-reduce-04
> Targeted LDP Hello Reduction
> (Note: Was adopted, but nothing happened)
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-tp-csf-02
> Indication of Client Failure in MPLS-TP
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-iana-01
> Label Distribution Protocol (LDP) Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA)
> Considerations Update
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-explicit-resource-control-b
> undle-10
> Component Link Recording and Resource Control for TE Links
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-upstream-05
> MPLS Upstream Label Assignment for RSVP-TE
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-tp-ach-tlv-02
> Definition of ACH TLV Structure
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-tp-process-05
> IETF Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) Transport Profile (MPLS-TP)
> Document Process
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-p2mp-te-bypass-02
> P2MP MPLS-TE Fast Reroute with P2MP Bypass Tunnels
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-mcast-cv-00
> Connectivity Verification for Multicast Label Switched Paths
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-dod-restart-00
> LDP DoD Graceful Restart
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-optical-uni-01
> LDP Extensions for Optical User Network Interface (O-UNI) Signaling
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-lmp-02
> Link Management Protocol (LMP)
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-diff-te-ext-01
> Extensions to RSVP-TE and CR-LDP for support of Diff-Serv-aware MPLS Traffic
> Engineering
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-diff-te-reqts-00
> Requirements for support of Diff-Serv-aware MPLS Traffic Engineering
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-hdr-comp-00
> MPLS/IP Header Compression
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-hdr-comp-over-ppp-00
> MPLS/IP Header Compression over PPP
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-loa-mpls-cap-set-01
> MPLS Capability set
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-framework-05
> A Framework for MPLS
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-ecn-00
> A Proposal to Incorporate ECN in MPLS
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-00
> Use of Label Switching With RSVP
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls

-- 
Loa Andersson                        email: [e-mail]
Senior MPLS Expert                          [e-mail]
Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: [phone]