IETF Logo Mail Archive

[mpls] Requesting WG LC for draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-shared-labels

Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com> Thu, 26 July 2018 03:07 UTC

Return-Path: <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A487130E95; Wed, 25 Jul 2018 20:07:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K3cL-GezJkbl; Wed, 25 Jul 2018 20:07:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl0-x235.google.com (mail-pl0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4523130E26; Wed, 25 Jul 2018 20:07:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl0-x235.google.com with SMTP id j8-v6so131465pll.12; Wed, 25 Jul 2018 20:07:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ECSDSyO6ZWbLdIVadMcmMcf6nMe0nuTf1jmjE15JfgM=; b=PU9OMCeK1Lq1erpg173ZIOgLXrxFmnrR12vL0KGov/0aEna8ImvhuOPpacQcxxFj9J QQA0otSGdw0vbSSVHjrrXD2fQ+j0Uy60f0eiUnPoUA8JAXH/BvaoZ1pPMNgOhSvC3AY8 KUgulZYO3AemXyTYqOvv+QSmqYkRPUgAsokkdNNPo+S8wMHr//HQDW/Nz5ulVnOcvlLm rIECYqyDkLqgUqSYyCFinb6cSYWOP4fd9pd4fGA/yh/VmPg+qaBSh6Vf480P724UfxhK 8Vo8bI0hRQPj//NgkMwfQ59FDFBCAOU0g3SaCQ7YFPtHXtsLZdXCs5GU9iC3YiCDwYjR oiwA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ECSDSyO6ZWbLdIVadMcmMcf6nMe0nuTf1jmjE15JfgM=; b=RPDuS020zfzb+Ydh5DrWZ2P9S7YAR4hZn3yy4T4vlgYS6hNX90ENRsSbMnwQLkg+EI NDmhSzMVrLJuWDuXz/ybNNYhcSM9gZxSAKBrqUz0CRrebBXUMhVouspwEX7leKi1pYoy bcx3mOlza0ccpzlsi9Om8UIcGif8KIzMyaSK3IOfkLiUVO+596hEfZgoaueiOIP5sDld Pzn+OXrhvcyS3/wZ8CFixD/vBtb9ee+9Io5mlVcWM7JSOYeGAk25e1YUdWfrupIvBImA JfAs5XCMyob3PNDYJrx1xIvq5RXV4inVHVr2xGdf29UFWaPW5jTwZ38Ucc/l3ntz5oum k9KA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlEnmpW7/JSSy3E/vh+kxu0B06TLNlisdxj6+xp+VQ7j+k2PYqHM vReft9VbetELop3FWt9MyiisdCzRxogFCJdVHTRXtYwJ
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpfMCpmrpwhy6tEBNPsJ7kdIj6rZI2A8QujPSXJaUr4sB1meFl2Ic2Vtp40ajkBoj1/feSspORITk0uCOoLikHk=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:209:: with SMTP id 9-v6mr227139plc.270.1532574462212; Wed, 25 Jul 2018 20:07:42 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a17:90a:cb96:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Jul 2018 20:07:41 -0700 (PDT)
From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2018 23:07:41 -0400
Message-ID: <CA+YzgTskvvzq6n=v156C8hB1=Yws--7nRFbNpUbUTSgWzhh9cw@mail.gmail.com>
To: mpls-chairs@ietf.org, IETF MPLS List <mpls@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-shared-labels@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006980370571de4c63"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/mjdKdfv30g-XyM9lUowqFg4at8M>
Subject: [mpls] Requesting WG LC for draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-shared-labels
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2018 03:07:46 -0000

Chairs, Hi!

As mentioned (in our presentation) in last week's WG session, we believe
that the draft is sufficiently baked and ready to progress to the next
stage. We would like to formally request this draft to be considered for WG
LC.

Regards,
- Pavan (on behalf of the authors)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email