Re: [mpls] Requesting WG LC for draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-shared-labels

Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com> Thu, 06 September 2018 15:27 UTC

Return-Path: <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99572130EDC for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Sep 2018 08:27:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s4K519mpie1N for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Sep 2018 08:27:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x42b.google.com (mail-pf1-x42b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 626C1130EBA for <mpls@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Sep 2018 08:27:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x42b.google.com with SMTP id d4-v6so5474212pfn.0 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Thu, 06 Sep 2018 08:27:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=q+KynaqxMZVYOeghLSLS62P7OCyk5K6KoINVB9rNMh8=; b=DTL9wlPO/FXlsxzYgsBnQV0aIbz9OlDsGEN5Bf5l37o4gdLWGZ6/1rsMykLGHeMcm5 RycfElFhITwShIOZuaMkqNhu2edIkO6nJ5MTRBYZhjxUgfHwg4WT7/Oe2GCo79coewO8 E3BWR5fJDHoARIDE6zHMFDvnvOqNCRcja120TtWBKmxNkArPzSBHuLG+xEIIK/l7JZcT NPcnFuWbIN7olHuPJ3OwrJh7ZJg4RYRUcL5YxFtRZaaPZ9VhFZG+fQRyF8bWN2icJxUC sAk8T7/9k5nQJd1vXnRWhIq1HOhcb+ydn8wq9FP0ePCyE32vly8RDixy+sbPym0PvH3R ltVQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=q+KynaqxMZVYOeghLSLS62P7OCyk5K6KoINVB9rNMh8=; b=RT9GWk7DPjP85UINxBLzWe7eUWFVrel9qlu+GkbdifVAMkRrOM/BU2lU/VShCvOYtH oENbfMqGE+FueiRKEqHqrjWcHmfXBE3cz7/eFBzOb3JE/PvyQAz29fTXCeGaR9ns6XjW yvgxk16T0z5X3dgVmsCl/6eDMbhM4V54DsnY463Vv48KupFRS7nMtWC09R+cqAbFr+AO NwD0gLYR9aLEUcn0kC5/+fcj04EaIjoqqI15FWrsYz+fLPnN32pNP7hMXO5RJu+thAbh 5/WEXIF80FZDKAxQocNRdaaxsYcLXRmEyqZ2GlvbwV7J1Zlr7JCx0z4nERGrwdUEDCaD k4AQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51Cw5J1iaI3ly/NefGygusZvtJDxeuHGsm79+NTNBT4JqRkekojT SfS30coaZGlp4WJaG0OOGzDIJDqmJyd5NPo4mKE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdbsOwMcRcCdcEh0j0IOJgJOalcGBtMnYBY7rrxmjgaphMuKhmosfS2IIAuhtzTeHozcd+NLYO021OcQNuFgs6A=
X-Received: by 2002:a63:b507:: with SMTP id y7-v6mr3342566pge.425.1536247648867; Thu, 06 Sep 2018 08:27:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CA+YzgTskvvzq6n=v156C8hB1=Yws--7nRFbNpUbUTSgWzhh9cw@mail.gmail.com> <211770d4-8279-33e2-b6bf-289261b6f6ff@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <211770d4-8279-33e2-b6bf-289261b6f6ff@gmail.com>
From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2018 11:27:17 -0400
Message-ID: <CA+YzgTt6qPhk83gjf+yG7zYVuDnTiUf=SMYJ3VYvKxqaWSHdQg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alexander Okonnikov <alexander.okonnikov@gmail.com>
Cc: IETF MPLS List <mpls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000065db7c0575358795"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/t3reGSUL-4JmRE0LsQxB1yHq4I8>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Requesting WG LC for draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-shared-labels
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2018 15:27:37 -0000

Alexander, Hi!

I apologize for the delayed response.

This draft does not propose any changes to the standard RSVP MTU signaling
procedures (Int Serv object specific signaling procedures). After the
initial signaling sequence is complete, an ingress implementation (RFC3209)
would typically take the path MTU learnt via signaling, run it through some
local logic and then arrive at an MTU value that can be assigned to the
LSP. This local logic typically involves deducting the number of bytes in
the label stack used for the LSP from the path MTU learnt via signaling.
The ingress implementation supporting this draft will rely on the Resv RRO
to accurately determine the max-number of labels pushed along the path of
the LSP (note that with delegation, downstream hops can impose label
stacks) and account for it in the local logic used to arrive at the MTU
value assigned to the LSP.

I hope this addresses your question.

Regards,
-Pavan

On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 12:22 PM Alexander Okonnikov <
alexander.okonnikov@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Pavan,
>
>
> Regular RSVP-TE LSPs use standard RSVP path MTU discovery mechanism. That
> one cannot be used "as is" for approach described in the draft, and the
> draft doesn't address path MTU identification. Is it to be considered?
>
>
> Thank you.
>
> 26.07.2018 06:07, Vishnu Pavan Beeram пишет:
>
> Chairs, Hi!
>
> As mentioned (in our presentation) in last week's WG session, we believe
> that the draft is sufficiently baked and ready to progress to the next
> stage. We would like to formally request this draft to be considered for WG
> LC.
>
> Regards,
> - Pavan (on behalf of the authors)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing listmpls@ietf.orghttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>