Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time

[Stefano Ruffini <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

same for me, I am not aware of any IPR related to this draft other than that already declared.

Best regards
stefano

-----Original Message-----
From: Stewart Bryant [mailto:[e-mail]] 
Sent: venerdì 29 aprile 2016 11:35
To: Loa Andersson; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Subject: Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time

I am not aware of any IPR related to this draft other than that already declared.

Stewart

On 29/04/2016 03:23, Loa Andersson wrote:
> Working Group,
>
> The authors of draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time has told us that the 
> document is ready to be considered for working group last call.
>
> We will do an IPR poll prior to the start of the wg last call.
>
> This mail starts the IPR poll.
>
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time?
>
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules 
> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
>
> There is one IPR disclosure filed against the document that was 
> replaced by the current draft.
>
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond 
> to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any 
> relevant IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the MPLS wg mailing 
> list.* The document will not advance to the next stage until a 
> response has been received from each author and contributor.
>
> If you are on the MPLS WG email list but are not listed as an author 
> or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware 
> of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
>
>
> /Loa
> mpls wg co-chair