Re: [mpls] New Liaison Statement, "Response to LS 392 "Request advance work on the p2mp framework in MPLS-TP""
Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Wed, 11 July 2012 07:48 UTC
Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B6D921F8550 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 00:48:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.858
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.858 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.551, BAYES_00=-2.599, MISSING_HEADERS=1.292, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G7l36exhuqQ4 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 00:48:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.pi.nu (mail.pi.nu [194.71.127.148]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 937A121F8549 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 00:48:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.64] (81-236-221-144-no93.tbcn.telia.com [81.236.221.144]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by mail.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 79B582A8003; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 09:48:42 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4FFD2FDB.7020008@pi.nu>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 09:48:43 +0200
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20120710111405.5643.86097.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120710111405.5643.86097.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: huub.van.helvoort@huawei.com, mpls@ietf.org, greg.jones@itu.int, yoichi.maeda@ttc.or.jp, hiroshi.ota@itu.int, rcallon@juniper.net, tsbsg15@itu.int, bilel.jamoussi@itu.int, elear@cisco.com, Ghani.Abbas@ericsson.com
Subject: Re: [mpls] New Liaison Statement, "Response to LS 392 "Request advance work on the p2mp framework in MPLS-TP""
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 07:48:16 -0000
All, when I sent out the liaison in response to LS392 "Request advance work on the p2mp framework in MPLS-TP" I asked that comments should be sent to the MPLS wg mailing list, but indicated the wrong mailing list. In the liaison on the liaison statement page this has now been corrected and says mpls@ietf.org. please use the working group mailing lsit. /Loa -- Loa Andersson email: loa.andersson@ericsson.com Sr Strategy and Standards Manager loa@pi.nu Ericsson Inc phone: +46 10 717 52 13 +46 767 72 92 13
- Re: [mpls] New Liaison Statement, "Response to LS… Loa Andersson