Re: [mpls] AD review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-identifiers

Adrian -

On 6/27/11 5:38 PM, "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I have done my AD review of this document. In view of the fact that my
> comments
> are quite small, could you please handle them as part of the IETF last call
> which I will start forthwith.
> 
> Thanks,
> Adrian
> 
> ---
>   
> You seem to be missing a section on MEP_IDs for MPLS_TP Sections.
> Insert before 7.2.1?
> 
Added the following section:

7.2.1.  MPLS-TP Section MEP_IDs

   IP compatible MEP_IDs for MPLS-TP are simply the IF_IDs of each end
   of the section.  For example, for a section whose MEG_ID is

      A1-IF_ID::Z9-IF_ID

   the Section MEP_ID at A1 would be

      A1-IF_ID

   and the Section MEP_ID at Z9 would be

      Z9-IF_ID.

   Where the Section MEP_ID needs to be globally unique, this is
   accomplished by using globally unique Node_IDs as defined above.
   Thus a globally unique Section MEP_ID becomes

      Global_ID::IF_ID.

> 
> ---
> 
> Nits
> 
> 1.3
> 
> OLD
> The notation does define a preferred ordering of the fields.
> NEW
> The notation defines a preferred ordering of the fields.
> END
> 
Done.
> 
> OLD
>  Z9 is used to indicated the
> NEW
>  Z9 is used to indicate the
> END
> 
Done.

...George
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
> 