Re:[mpls] draft-yasukawa-mpls-p2mp-oam-reqs-01.txtto become aworking group document?
"chasey_ch" <chasey_ch@indiatimes.com> Sun, 11 December 2005 19:18 UTC
Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1ElWiP-0008Li-B3; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 14:18:33 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1ElWiM-0008Jg-Ch for mpls@megatron.ietf.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 14:18:31 -0500
Received: from WS0005.indiatimes.com (smtp5.indiatimes.com [203.199.93.15]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA26583 for <mpls@lists.ietf.org>; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 14:17:33 -0500 (EST)
Received: from 192.168.57.15 (a3 [192.168.57.23]) by WS0005.indiatimes.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id AAA01923 for <mpls@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 00:36:52 +0530
From: chasey_ch <chasey_ch@indiatimes.com>
Message-Id: <200512111906.AAA01923@WS0005.indiatimes.com>
To: mpls@ietf.org
Subject: Re:[mpls] draft-yasukawa-mpls-p2mp-oam-reqs-01.txtto become aworking group document?
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 00:56:53 +0530
X-URL: http://indiatimes.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc:
X-BeenThere: mpls@lists.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: chasey_ch <chasey_ch@indiatimes.com>
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.lists.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@lists.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: mpls-bounces@lists.ietf.org
Errors-To: mpls-bounces@lists.ietf.org
few humble questions (tell me if am wrong fundamentally): 1. why the draft doesnt talk about segment OAM though for PMP scalability as an issue? 2. why there is no mention of OAM procedure for backup tunnel (especially for facility protection when one path can backup multiple paths, hence should never go down ideally) thanks, chasey [mpls] draft-yasukawa-mpls-p2mp-oam-reqs-01.txtto become aworking group document? From: "Sheetal A. Vispute_p05274" <vsheetal@ee.iitb.ac.in> Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 12:47:43 +0530 (IST) Cc: mpls@ietf.org Hi Loa, yes it very important to become a WG doc cheers Sheetal On Tue, 6 Dec 2005, Loa Andersson wrote: > All, > > In Vancouver we discussed the draft-yasukawa-mpls-p2mp-oam-reqs-01.txt, > when aksing the room about the consensus on making it a working group > document, there were good support for making it a working group > document. > > We said that we wanted to confirm this on the list. Please > send response to this mail to the MPLS mailing list stating whether > you think it should become a working group document or not. > > /Loa > _______________________________________________ mpls mailing list mpls@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls References: [mpls] draft-yasukawa-mpls-p2mp-oam-reqs-01.txtto become a workinggroup document? From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.se> [mpls] draft-yasukawa-mpls-p2mp-oam-reqs-01.txtto become a workinggroup document? From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.se> _______________________________________________ mpls mailing list mpls@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
- Re:[mpls] draft-yasukawa-mpls-p2mp-oam-reqs-01.tx… chasey_ch
- Re: Re:[mpls] draft-yasukawa-mpls-p2mp-oam-reqs-0… Adrian Farrel