IETF Logo Mail Archive

[mpls] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6512 (6754)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 25 November 2021 11:38 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E25B3A0796 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 03:38:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RyGjlQdreveE for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 03:37:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B2313A0791 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 03:37:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 499) id F03D7622CF6; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 03:37:53 -0800 (PST)
To: ice@cisco.com, erosen@cisco.com, mnapierala@att.com, n.leymann@telekom.de, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, jgs@juniper.net, martin.vigoureux@nokia.com, loa@pi.nu, n.leymann@telekom.de, tsaad.net@gmail.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: bert.van.ael@nomios.be, mpls@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20211125113753.F03D7622CF6@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 03:37:53 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/qAsm9c81SxAXMwFfccHl3726PgA>
Subject: [mpls] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6512 (6754)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 11:38:02 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6512,
"Using Multipoint LDP When the Backbone Has No Route to the Root".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6754

--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: Bert Van Ael <bert.van.ael@nomios.be>

Section: 3.2.1

Original Text
-------------
PE1 also has this Inter-AS I-PMSI A-D route.

Corrected Text
--------------
PE1 also has this Intra-AS I-PMSI A-D route.

Notes
-----
"PE1 also has this route" refers to "Although ASBR1 does not have a route to PE2, it does have a BGP Intra-AS Inclusive PMSI (I-PMSI) auto-discovery (A-D) route". Intra-AS mechanisms are used for auto-discovery/binding for Non-Segmented Inter-AS Tunnels.

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC6512 (draft-ietf-mpls-mldp-recurs-fec-04)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Using Multipoint LDP When the Backbone Has No Route to the Root
Publication Date    : February 2012
Author(s)           : IJ. Wijnands, E. Rosen, M. Napierala, N. Leymann
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Multiprotocol Label Switching
Area                : Routing
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email