[mpls] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mpls-te-express-path-00.txt
internet-drafts@ietf.org Wed, 16 October 2013 14:02 UTC
Return-Path: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF83C11E82AA; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 07:02:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.578
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.578 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.022, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u8cEw6hbj0NK; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 07:02:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1015811E82AB; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 07:02:38 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.80.p2
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20131016140238.32157.75369.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 07:02:38 -0700
Cc: mpls@ietf.org
Subject: [mpls] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mpls-te-express-path-00.txt
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 14:02:43 -0000
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Multiprotocol Label Switching Working Group of the IETF. Title : Performance-based Path Selection for Explicitly Routed LSPs using TE Metric Extensions Author(s) : Alia Atlas John Drake Spencer Giacalone Dave Ward Stefano Previdi Clarence Filsfils Filename : draft-ietf-mpls-te-express-path-00.txt Pages : 10 Date : 2013-10-16 Abstract: In certain networks, it is critical to consider network performance criteria when selecting the path for an explicitly routed RSVP-TE LSP. Such performance criteria can include latency, jitter, and loss or other indications such as the conformance to link performance objectives and non-RSVP TE traffic load. This specification uses network performance data, such as is advertised via the OSPF and ISIS TE metric extensions (defined outside the scope of this document) to perform such path selections. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-te-express-path There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mpls-te-express-path-00 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
- [mpls] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mpls-te-express-pat… internet-drafts