[mpls] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mpls-te-express-path-00.txt

internet-drafts@ietf.org Wed, 16 October 2013 14:02 UTC

Return-Path: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF83C11E82AA; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 07:02:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.578
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.578 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.022, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u8cEw6hbj0NK; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 07:02:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1015811E82AB; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 07:02:38 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.80.p2
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20131016140238.32157.75369.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 07:02:38 -0700
Cc: mpls@ietf.org
Subject: [mpls] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mpls-te-express-path-00.txt
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 14:02:43 -0000

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
 This draft is a work item of the Multiprotocol Label Switching Working Group of the IETF.

	Title           : Performance-based Path Selection for Explicitly Routed LSPs using TE Metric Extensions
	Author(s)       : Alia Atlas
                          John Drake
                          Spencer Giacalone
                          Dave Ward
                          Stefano Previdi
                          Clarence Filsfils
	Filename        : draft-ietf-mpls-te-express-path-00.txt
	Pages           : 10
	Date            : 2013-10-16

Abstract:
   In certain networks, it is critical to consider network performance
   criteria when selecting the path for an explicitly routed RSVP-TE
   LSP.  Such performance criteria can include latency, jitter, and loss
   or other indications such as the conformance to link performance
   objectives and non-RSVP TE traffic load.  This specification uses
   network performance data, such as is advertised via the OSPF and ISIS
   TE metric extensions (defined outside the scope of this document) to
   perform such path selections.


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-te-express-path

There's also a htmlized version available at:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mpls-te-express-path-00


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/