IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] poll on the Rosetta Stone draft

Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com> Mon, 01 June 2009 12:59 UTC

Return-Path: <stbryant@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D99EE3A68AD; Mon, 1 Jun 2009 05:59:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.850, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id il6kjSzA2BMp; Mon, 1 Jun 2009 05:59:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-2.cisco.com (sj-iport-2.cisco.com [171.71.176.71]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31C3D3A6843; Mon, 1 Jun 2009 05:59:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.41,284,1241395200"; d="scan'208";a="170951583"
Received: from ams-dkim-2.cisco.com ([144.254.224.139]) by sj-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 01 Jun 2009 12:58:59 +0000
Received: from ams-core-1.cisco.com (ams-core-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.150]) by ams-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n51CwwhF010635; Mon, 1 Jun 2009 14:58:58 +0200
Received: from cisco.com (mrwint.cisco.com [64.103.71.48]) by ams-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n51Cww4Z029391; Mon, 1 Jun 2009 12:58:58 GMT
Received: from dhcp-bdlk09-vlan301-data-64-103-105-5.cisco.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cisco.com (8.11.7p3+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id n51Cwwf05268; Mon, 1 Jun 2009 13:58:58 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <4A23D092.8010005@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 13:58:58 +0100
From: Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Macintosh/20081209)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
References: <4A1BB784.7030501@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <4A1BB784.7030501@pi.nu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=459; t=1243861138; x=1244725138; c=relaxed/simple; s=amsdkim2001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=stbryant@cisco.com; z=From:=20Stewart=20Bryant=20<stbryant@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[mpls]=20poll=20on=20the=20Rosetta=20St one=20draft |Sender:=20; bh=5AM9CqO4XplyfDWzYlap7TXW05M6ivvyj5NlXg4YFYw=; b=jynGk05mUhuMpMAX1jlFSf+Vi+UDxQ3+9QZ6u0M2Sgx8LAlcjNrY4TuAg6 FyFX2zOduq9Y2kWy1/8sQ/NvV/sWlI7pEmc99htjjPM7eMAdp0JXGnIHzxwP LZr6QcnODH;
Authentication-Results: ams-dkim-2; header.From=stbryant@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/amsdkim2001 verified; );
Cc: mpls@ietf.org, pwe3@ietf.org, mpls-tp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mpls] poll on the Rosetta Stone draft
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: stbryant@cisco.com
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 12:59:00 -0000

> this is to start a two week poll on the suggestion to make the
> draft-helvoort-mpls-tp-rosetta-stone-00 an MPLS working group
> document.
>
Normally we would require a draft to be in a cleaner
state before accepting it as a WG draft. None-the-less
I support this being a WG draft.

One question - I assume that it will not be published
as an RFC for a while so that we can continue to
add new terms to it as the project progresses.

Stewart

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email