Re: [mpls] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5036 (5587)

Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Sat, 05 January 2019 09:44 UTC

To: db3546@att.com
Cc: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, Ina Minei <inaminei@google.com>, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, martin.vigoureux@nokia.com, n.leymann@telekom.de, ramakrishnadtv@gmail.com, mpls@ietf.org
References: <20181228045757.C391EB80E7F@rfc-editor.org>
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Message-ID: <1a18bde2-f2a0-722a-f619-7d0f58b76458@pi.nu>
Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2019 17:43:27 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20181228045757.C391EB80E7F@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/rY0rOxFshNMKHcQrM3LiPlBj6Fk>
Subject: Re: [mpls] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5036 (5587)
Precedence: list

Deborah,

I've discussed with Adrian, and we agree that the errata is correct,
however it is very minor and does not really effect the reading of
the document.

Classify it as "grammar/editorial" and keep it for a potential update.

/Loa

On 2018-12-28 12:57, RFC Errata System wrote:
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5036,
> "LDP Specification".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5587
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Ramakrishna Rao DTV <ramakrishnadtv@gmail.com>
> 
> Section: 2.6.2.2
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
>    "In Downstream Unsolicited advertisement mode, label mapping
>     advertisements for all routes may be received from all LDP peers.
>     When using Liberal Label retention, every label mappings received
>     from a peer LSR is retained regardless of whether the LSR is the next
>     hop for the advertised mapping..."
> 
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>    "In Downstream Unsolicited advertisement mode, label mapping
>     advertisements for all routes may be received from all LDP peers.
>     When using Liberal Label retention, every label mapping received
>     from a peer LSR is retained regardless of whether the LSR is the next
>     hop for the advertised mapping..."
> 
> 
> Notes
> -----
> s/mappings/mapping/
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC5036 (draft-ietf-mpls-rfc3036bis-04)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : LDP Specification
> Publication Date    : October 2007
> Author(s)           : L. Andersson, Ed., I. Minei, Ed., B. Thomas, Ed.
> Category            : DRAFT STANDARD
> Source              : Multiprotocol Label Switching
> Area                : Routing
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
> 

-- 


Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu
Senior MPLS Expert
Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64

[mpls] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5036 (5587) RFC Errata System
Re: [mpls] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5036 (5… Loa Andersson