Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to adopt draft-smiler-mpls-tp-linear-protection-mib as a wg doc

["Andrew G. Malis" <[e-mail]>]

Support! How can we turn away a directly applicable MIB module? That would
be madness ....


On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 8:50 AM, Daniel King <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Support (as an author).
>
> RFC6378 presents a protocol/mechanism for MPLS-TP linear protection. This
> (draft-smiler-mpls-tp-linear-protection-mib) document specifies the
> necessary textual conventions and MIB module for monitoring MPLS-TP linear
> protection on the LER.
>
> Br, Dan.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Loa Andersson [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: 28 January 2013 10:33
> To: [e-mail]
> Cc: [e-mail];
> [e-mail];
> <[e-mail]>; Martin Vigoureux
> Subject: poll to see if we have consensus to adopt
> draft-smiler-mpls-tp-linear-protection-mib as a wg doc
>
> Working group,
>
> This is to start a two week poll on adopting
> draft-smiler-mpls-tp-linear-protection-mib as an MPLS working group
> document.
>
> Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working group
> mailing list (mpls at ietf.org). Please give a technical motivation for
> your
> support/not support, especially if you think that the document should not
> be
> adopted as a working group document.
>
> This poll ends February 8, 2013.
>
> There are no IPR claim against this document.
>
> All the active co-authors has stated on the working group mailing list that
> they are not aware of any other IPR claims than those already disclosed.
> However if you are on the the mpls working group mailing list and aware of
> IPR that relates to this draft, the time to disclose this is now.
>
> /Loa
> (mpls wg co-chair)
>
> --
> --
>
>
> Loa Andersson                        email: [e-mail]
> MPLS Expert                                 [e-mail]
> Huawei Technologies (consult)        phone: [phone]
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>