[mpls] Requesting the WG LC on draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed
Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Thu, 24 March 2022 12:29 UTC
Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB0253A11A1; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 05:29:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ynT3rSXtPb-s; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 05:29:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x134.google.com (mail-lf1-x134.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6AB6E3A0E04; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 05:29:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x134.google.com with SMTP id k21so7776281lfe.4; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 05:29:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Rp46gf2BHgdp4t6O4wIPqylDyLQ9vkClkdN8aR2OA8Q=; b=Zac672lcWfBM5kmrqgCBoxL1wurgVQm2DDY0b/ypWnFsDe8s9NCrxiNZi7ZNkY8zkv BtCysVWXslzAkq3RrQvsVzV6ZOdhRB5ltklTBLK35poTmIZ1f8NTnjl01Oz34Z2dp0MB usZv9+DqFw/YfG++pRu90K38gXpTB5BKnjjc7TcBD28/A5E1VImCVW6RXfPgZsJDpBBH NLV6PkCYYDyfzvaHT1U1WiiHZ1nhVeXrxPblJ7n08QGRYqvVlDuld4nDgdxNj4Xx/Jbk nrtBnFEVN9mlhwnXGx9qY8gaPi3mv+mh1hhfyBdhKyiq8AfFCqlHbrhW082wrEJBpOMh VRJw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Rp46gf2BHgdp4t6O4wIPqylDyLQ9vkClkdN8aR2OA8Q=; b=lCLjRo5NRz7AUPZr34zsuWHsWxHdx1EkhDuFpE7pooidlVKsX63r55MKgvU0nMSRjx x6HmMhJe/aOizTXoYTjCxyt8g6A9GBGvA28AhYULMGOdJTbmVRLSHJ/S93zxfC0lqwbW VDlj7pFc55IxT0SRnkb4dM/Be3rRxG+d+hXKm0kdrKEt8lYYxQvw2htu/mKU19W1pOnu DUaPzgaS80vcV/Kn+d2iTZiCe94f/33LDuJ+NeSzA8t5Umt1a3VhZ+gCMUOm5KSaJrg3 jN5OsgmU6NQ2YuudeiGd6mFAROpaUejB8ErHA6UoznzOZw2NGdHn8roZLcQ8HVN+fOTt /LRA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531vE4AVwXNeTWFut9vYPzrZ5HBKCI+VWiwL20NKp1fdYQUDCNh6 A9dSEIGiiLrnqrhXpeb+04tvAi+hvWoFJMbWWN7YHwivzsI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJycDl8BSwmeeJ2oBXklQ6oD4Y5OxX1FDXsl5Psq6aOfDpbtT7Wi1ewHVW8q4mjnLS7gqPGDPUtPGPKva5acaVc=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:16a1:b0:44a:2c56:3952 with SMTP id bu33-20020a05651216a100b0044a2c563952mr3776683lfb.382.1648124940225; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 05:29:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2022 05:28:48 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmXXDzRr9zBOKNeg7dy7cMgugoWggQd-eM5+CxVAv0+kbQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: MPLS Working Group <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, mpls <mpls@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009b8ffd05daf5fdc9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/tak_zpRJwRndI-jTr7II7JdtQa0>
Subject: [mpls] Requesting the WG LC on draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2022 12:29:12 -0000
Dear All, the authors of draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed believe that the draft is ready for the WG LC. We've identified one implementation that uses the proposed extension to LSP Ping. Also, two operators acknowledged that the problem addressed by the draft is real, the solution is viable, supported progressing to the WG LC ( https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/j3kHHFhDEpcsDD3-UKuoQSjYtZ8/ <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/j3kHHFhDEpcsDD3-UKuoQSjYtZ8/> and https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/72YKmdAIHWUO3A7cQnx84kVjSaI/ <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/72YKmdAIHWUO3A7cQnx84kVjSaI/>). Please let us know if you have any questions. Regards, Greg (on behalf of the authors)