[mpls] doubt on RSVP-TE over non RSVP cloud
Santosh P K <sanpk316@gmail.com> Tue, 03 March 2009 09:49 UTC
Return-Path: <sanpk316@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F1ED3A6920 for <mpls@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Mar 2009 01:49:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tI7TbwDeHrS1 for <mpls@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Mar 2009 01:49:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.233]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 901283A67E7 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Mar 2009 01:49:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id l9so2471624rvb.49 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 01:49:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=kNnCapjF4pL6ZZYz7DMU1EZZzASnL10/0lv1FIuqhFs=; b=deOLawIB8CdlC6zzRmSCQKpcvibiZ4z+/FxhTLTd4upAIRE2uqn3txg13KaVkyhD6/ vinwc7Y26NL/gm3DANE5bBGhD1vw2mxGQKP/Z0iVMtk3TVa3x6llpx/hXPZY8WF6loLu tDrZ6FAqJF7ZJ7bXMrY3xXIYFVygCYEboTh/4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=tL0UoBH5uD7cFl3oeQJoS8GJosxKUXvkaaIVGxsxg+q2vG4VAeRVfTKLuW13n2jdWu GzHJC8DxRVCjAZgfEjH0zkbQ+hTw5fHa0BXS28cGt+qkwUNTH2/R2ZPrMbA+MDdywQkk ossglfF3WnMlUB8PvbuK/NSzLwQMBdkpR6ia8=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.141.210.21 with SMTP id m21mr3419302rvq.204.1236073789415; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 01:49:49 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 15:19:49 +0530
Message-ID: <a0d41f8e0903030149m784463c0y5a6865082bc06eda@mail.gmail.com>
From: Santosh P K <sanpk316@gmail.com>
To: mpls@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000e0cd29c34225fa3046433db93"
Subject: [mpls] doubt on RSVP-TE over non RSVP cloud
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 09:49:23 -0000
Hi All,
As per RFC 3209 it mentions that RSVP-TE LSP can’t be established over
non RSVP-TE could. Is it because there is no use case scenario of TE-LSP
over non RSVP-TE?. Can you please provide me some use case scenario if any.
Thanks and regards
Santosh P K
- [mpls] doubt on RSVP-TE over non RSVP cloud Santosh P K
- Re: [mpls] doubt on RSVP-TE over non RSVP cloud Santanu Ganguly