[mpls] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mpls-self-ping-03.txt
internet-drafts@ietf.org Sat, 05 September 2015 20:18 UTC
Return-Path: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB56A1B4340; Sat, 5 Sep 2015 13:18:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uaIZ5j-zwsrh; Sat, 5 Sep 2015 13:18:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98B931B4347; Sat, 5 Sep 2015 13:18:31 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.4.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20150905201831.24313.88760.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sat, 05 Sep 2015 13:18:31 -0700
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/ucQlBtkkEOdmxF9mNy448a7VE0U>
Cc: mpls@ietf.org
Subject: [mpls] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mpls-self-ping-03.txt
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Sep 2015 20:18:33 -0000
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Multiprotocol Label Switching Working Group of the IETF. Title : LSP Self-Ping Authors : Ravi Torvi Ron Bonica Ina Minei Michael Conn Dante Pacella Luis Tomotaki Mark Wygant Filename : draft-ietf-mpls-self-ping-03.txt Pages : 11 Date : 2015-09-05 Abstract: When certain RSVP-TE optimizations are implemented, ingress LSRs can receive RSVP RESV messages before forwarding state has been installed on all downstream nodes. According to the RSVP-TE specification, the ingress LSR can forward traffic through an LSP as soon as it receives a RESV message. However, if the ingress LSR forwards traffic through the LSP before forwarding state has been installed on all downstream nodes, traffic can be lost. This memo describes LSP Self-ping. When an ingress LSR receives an RESV message, it can invoke LSP Self-ping procedures to ensure that forwarding state has been installed on all downstream nodes. LSP Self-ping is an extremely light-weight mechanism. It does not consume control plane resources on transit or egress LSRs. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-self-ping/ There's also a htmlized version available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mpls-self-ping-03 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-mpls-self-ping-03 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
- [mpls] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mpls-self-ping-03.t… internet-drafts