[mpls] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5951 (3254)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 12 June 2012 04:16 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5A3511E8091 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 21:16:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.363
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.363 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.237, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wpn-52UOdh+U for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 21:16:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3ED611E8087 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 21:16:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id B695DB1E003; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 21:16:08 -0700 (PDT)
To: Kam.Lam@Alcatel-Lucent.com, Scott.Mansfield@Ericsson.com, Kam.Lam@Alcatel-Lucent.com, stbryant@cisco.com, adrian@olddog.co.uk, loa@pi.nu, swallow@cisco.com, rcallon@juniper.net
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20120612041608.B695DB1E003@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 21:16:08 -0700
Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, mpls@ietf.org
Subject: [mpls] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5951 (3254)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 04:16:16 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5951, "Network Management Requirements for MPLS-based Transport Networks". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5951&eid=3254 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Section: 6.3 Original Text ------------- 1) In addition to the requirement to support static provisioning of transport paths (defined in RFC 5645 [7], Section 2.1 Corrected Text -------------- 1) In addition to the requirement to support static provisioning of transport paths (defined in RFC 5654 [7], Section 2.1 Notes ----- Digits in RFC number transposed Instructions: ------------- This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC5951 (draft-ietf-mpls-tp-nm-req-06) -------------------------------------- Title : Network Management Requirements for MPLS-based Transport Networks Publication Date : September 2010 Author(s) : K. Lam, S. Mansfield, E. Gray Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Multiprotocol Label Switching Area : Routing Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [mpls] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5951 (3254) RFC Errata System