[mpls] [Errata Verified] RFC4090 (6203)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Fri, 26 February 2021 22:03 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FDE73A0CE7; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 14:03:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c18QflJlYfoB; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 14:03:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CAFC3A0CDC; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 14:03:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 75E5BF40760; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 14:03:01 -0800 (PST)
To: mihiramrelia_89@yahoo.com, ppan@hammerheadsystems.com, swallow@cisco.com, aatlas@avici.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: db3546@att.com, iesg@ietf.org, mpls@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20210226220301.75E5BF40760@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 14:03:01 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/usZ1mQkDX80I6dbcfH74HxnL94I>
Subject: [mpls] [Errata Verified] RFC4090 (6203)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 22:03:15 -0000

The following errata report has been verified for RFC4090,
"Fast Reroute Extensions to RSVP-TE for LSP Tunnels". 

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6203

--------------------------------------
Status: Verified
Type: Technical

Reported by: Mihir Amrelia <mihiramrelia_89@yahoo.com>
Date Reported: 2020-06-03
Verified by: Deborah Brungard (IESG)

Section: 6

Original Text
-------------
If the "bandwidth protection guaranteed" flag is set, the PLR SHOULD try to
provide a bandwidth guarantee; if this is not feasible, the PLR SHOULD then try
to provide a backup without a guarantee of the full bandwidth.



Corrected Text
--------------
If the "bandwidth protection desired" flag is set in SESSION_ATTRIBUTE, the PLR
SHOULD try to provide a bandwidth guarantee; if this is not feasible, the PLR
SHOULD then try to provide a backup without a guarantee of the full bandwidth.



Notes
-----
Correcting flag name.

--------------------------------------
RFC4090 (draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-lsp-fastreroute-07)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Fast Reroute Extensions to RSVP-TE for LSP Tunnels
Publication Date    : May 2005
Author(s)           : P. Pan, Ed., G. Swallow, Ed., A. Atlas, Ed.
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Multiprotocol Label Switching
Area                : Routing
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG