Re: [mpls] colliding sub-TLVs for three MPLS wg drafts

Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Sat, 06 November 2010 01:22 UTC

Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: mpls@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9E953A69B1; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 18:22:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gn+B4AYakmUj; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 18:22:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.pi.nu (mail.pi.nu [194.71.127.148]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 287CC3A69B0; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 18:22:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [130.129.119.231] (dhcp-77e7.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.119.231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by mail.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CE02751401F; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 02:22:21 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <4CD4ADCA.2090400@pi.nu>
Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 09:22:18 +0800
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "mpls-tp@ietf.org" <mpls-tp@ietf.org>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
References: <4CC84B41.9000506@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <4CC84B41.9000506@pi.nu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [mpls] colliding sub-TLVs for three MPLS wg drafts
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 01:22:15 -0000

Working Group,

just a quick reminder about this issue. Since I've not heard anything I
will start working towards an acceptable solution hear in Beijing.

However, the deadline to notify us about existing implementations and
deployments of the code points for the cc-cv-rdi draft is still
Thursday.

/Loa

On 2010-10-27 23:54, Loa Andersson wrote:
> Working Group,
>
> we have been working to progress several drafts to RFCs. Sometimes
> the process requires that we do early IANA allocations because some
> vendors has started to implement or even deploying equipment that
> relies on code points defined in the drafts.
>
> What has happened now is that we have two drafts
>
> draft-ietf-mpls-p2mp-lsp-ping
> draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-enhanced-dsmap
>
> that has been comparatively stable for a long time, but on and
> off been waiting on each other. We have done a "two document"
> working group last call. We now have the documents in shape
> to request publication. Both documents are implemented and
> deployed.
>
> These documents request IANA allocation for 4 different sub-tlv's.
>
> We also have
>
> draft-ietf-mpls-tp-on-demand-cv
>
> for this document we requested early IANA allocation of two
> sub-tlv's. The code-points were granted recently.
>
> What has happened is that the code-points were assigned as
> early allocations as has been used when implementing
> draft-ietf-mpls-p2mp-lsp-ping.
>
> The easiest way out would be to assign new code-points to
> draft-ietf-mpls-tp-on-demand-cv and in the publication process
> assign the same code-pints to draft-ietf-mpls-p2mp-lsp-ping
> that has been used during the implementation.
>
> We therefore need to know
>
> 1. If anyone has implemented draft-ietf-mpls-tp-on-demand-cv
> using the code points assigned as an early allocation
> 2. If this implementation has been deployed.
> 3. If it possible to use new code points even if the first
> implementation uses the code points assigned through early
> allocation.
>
> We need your responses November 12, 2010 the latest.
>
> The working group chairs will also make sure that we do not
> any similar potential "double allocations" in waiting.
>
> /Loa

-- 


Loa Andersson                         email: loa.andersson@ericsson.com
Sr Strategy and Standards Manager            loa@pi.nu
Ericsson Inc                          phone: +46 10 717 52 13
                                              +46 767 72 92 13