Re: [mpls] colliding sub-TLVs for three MPLS wg drafts
Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Sat, 06 November 2010 01:22 UTC
Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: mpls@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9E953A69B1; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 18:22:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gn+B4AYakmUj; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 18:22:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.pi.nu (mail.pi.nu [194.71.127.148]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 287CC3A69B0; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 18:22:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [130.129.119.231] (dhcp-77e7.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.119.231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by mail.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CE02751401F; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 02:22:21 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <4CD4ADCA.2090400@pi.nu>
Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 09:22:18 +0800
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "mpls-tp@ietf.org" <mpls-tp@ietf.org>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
References: <4CC84B41.9000506@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <4CC84B41.9000506@pi.nu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [mpls] colliding sub-TLVs for three MPLS wg drafts
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 01:22:15 -0000
Working Group, just a quick reminder about this issue. Since I've not heard anything I will start working towards an acceptable solution hear in Beijing. However, the deadline to notify us about existing implementations and deployments of the code points for the cc-cv-rdi draft is still Thursday. /Loa On 2010-10-27 23:54, Loa Andersson wrote: > Working Group, > > we have been working to progress several drafts to RFCs. Sometimes > the process requires that we do early IANA allocations because some > vendors has started to implement or even deploying equipment that > relies on code points defined in the drafts. > > What has happened now is that we have two drafts > > draft-ietf-mpls-p2mp-lsp-ping > draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-enhanced-dsmap > > that has been comparatively stable for a long time, but on and > off been waiting on each other. We have done a "two document" > working group last call. We now have the documents in shape > to request publication. Both documents are implemented and > deployed. > > These documents request IANA allocation for 4 different sub-tlv's. > > We also have > > draft-ietf-mpls-tp-on-demand-cv > > for this document we requested early IANA allocation of two > sub-tlv's. The code-points were granted recently. > > What has happened is that the code-points were assigned as > early allocations as has been used when implementing > draft-ietf-mpls-p2mp-lsp-ping. > > The easiest way out would be to assign new code-points to > draft-ietf-mpls-tp-on-demand-cv and in the publication process > assign the same code-pints to draft-ietf-mpls-p2mp-lsp-ping > that has been used during the implementation. > > We therefore need to know > > 1. If anyone has implemented draft-ietf-mpls-tp-on-demand-cv > using the code points assigned as an early allocation > 2. If this implementation has been deployed. > 3. If it possible to use new code points even if the first > implementation uses the code points assigned through early > allocation. > > We need your responses November 12, 2010 the latest. > > The working group chairs will also make sure that we do not > any similar potential "double allocations" in waiting. > > /Loa -- Loa Andersson email: loa.andersson@ericsson.com Sr Strategy and Standards Manager loa@pi.nu Ericsson Inc phone: +46 10 717 52 13 +46 767 72 92 13
- [mpls] colliding sub-TLVs for three MPLS wg drafts Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] colliding sub-TLVs for three MPLS wg d… Loa Andersson