[mpls] Closed - Re: Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt draft-cui-mpls-tp-mfp-use-case-and-requirements

Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Mon, 01 February 2016 06:25 UTC

Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B91A1ACE37; Sun, 31 Jan 2016 22:25:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jRyNA7Wo3I8n; Sun, 31 Jan 2016 22:25:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B34C31ACE3C; Sun, 31 Jan 2016 22:25:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.13] (unknown [49.149.222.125]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 84BDC180137F; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 07:25:36 +0100 (CET)
To: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
References: <5694D729.5000505@pi.nu>
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Message-ID: <56AEFA53.5000301@pi.nu>
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2016 14:25:23 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5694D729.5000505@pi.nu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/w7mDXWPxhpKI_loejVvudx947n8>
Cc: "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-cui-mpls-tp-mfp-use-case-and-requirements@ietf.org" <draft-cui-mpls-tp-mfp-use-case-and-requirements@ietf.org>
Subject: [mpls] Closed - Re: Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt draft-cui-mpls-tp-mfp-use-case-and-requirements
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2016 06:25:41 -0000

Working,

My apologies - I thought I missed on response on the IPR poll, but after
checking the MPLS wg mailing list archive I found it :)!

This poll for working group adoption is closed.

We have a new working group document, could the authors please post a
new version called draft-ietf-mpls-tp-mfp-use-case-and-requirements,
with no other changes than file name and date.

/Loa

On 2016-01-12 18:36, Loa Andersson wrote:
> Working Group,
>
> This is to start a two week poll on adopting draft-cui-mpls-tp-mfp-
> use-case-and-requirements as an MPLS working group document.
>
> Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working
> group mailing list (mpls@ietf.org). Please give a technical
> motivation for your support/not support, especially if you think that
> the document should not be adopted as a working group document.
>
> There are no IPR disclosures against this document.
>
> We have an IPR poll running in parallel, his poll ends January 27, 2016;
> or when the IPR poll has concluded if that is later than January 27.
>
> /Loa