[mpls] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply-08.txt

internet-drafts@ietf.org Tue, 28 April 2015 09:01 UTC

Return-Path: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1DF71A1BB0; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 02:01:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7-bVA29019XZ; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 02:01:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C11791A1B25; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 02:01:38 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.0.2
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20150428090138.18519.8705.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 02:01:38 -0700
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/wL1F_DfU-KV--iP29uWzCk5HQfI>
Cc: mpls@ietf.org
Subject: [mpls] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply-08.txt
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 09:01:40 -0000

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
 This draft is a work item of the Multiprotocol Label Switching Working Group of the IETF.

        Title           : Relayed Echo Reply mechanism for LSP Ping
        Authors         : Jian Luo
                          Lizhong Jin
                          Thomas Nadeau
                          George Swallow
	Filename        : draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply-08.txt
	Pages           : 16
	Date            : 2015-04-28

Abstract:
   In some inter autonomous system (AS) and inter-area deployment
   scenarios for RFC 4379 "Label Switched Path (LSP) Ping and
   Traceroute", a replying LSR may not have the available route to the
   initiator, and the Echo Reply message sent to the initiator would be
   discarded resulting in false negatives or complete failure of
   operation of LSP Ping and Traceroute.  This document describes
   extensions to LSP Ping mechanism to enable the replying Label
   Switching Router (LSR) to have the capability to relay the Echo
   Response by a set of routable intermediate nodes to the initiator.
   This document updates RFC 4379.


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply/

There's also a htmlized version available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply-08

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https:https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply-08


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/