IETF Logo Mail Archive

[mpls] (no subject)

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Sat, 13 October 2018 20:24 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8813130E6D; Sat, 13 Oct 2018 13:24:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x5Z6ASYj576I; Sat, 13 Oct 2018 13:24:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x141.google.com (mail-lf1-x141.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::141]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB2FF130E27; Sat, 13 Oct 2018 13:24:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x141.google.com with SMTP id q39-v6so11540194lfi.8; Sat, 13 Oct 2018 13:24:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=a1qQ27910k5Zi2OhB3sUn9YI9vR9Pv6S44Cbdiqsdrg=; b=Vy1AQJXGENDfwiqnB0dfTwgs2lUow05eQ90slamPwFoZhLukeBwmcyTfyFJ3XdGqSv 9t0KMESeurm7QD6js1fL1mhZ9Tq5RpDgMC6kgudDWWm0eiT9QAGWxh/fgVrjaF3iVK+I N1H/y4yfyh6wvo8WJkGCP1hBj+Ltm/DJWsSgdKVck3vXlu9I1Oxtd68bBrduW9ZEXulZ AcTslO0+wSNbT+aKf28tOPWLDf81IevU8EE7zkPQZW9hCHDrrdO9/YiES203ZRsIGvEx T3afAjYI0uG/m4Spq0hsciJWzAo4s5Or6Y2Zlf6WEc+EQ3XpqRuNNYRJkqh+BrBybDSv Ndhg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=a1qQ27910k5Zi2OhB3sUn9YI9vR9Pv6S44Cbdiqsdrg=; b=M1aGvA/87SHWx1V3ztm8nKoa9l7BzIFSgfPIP/+nkv8L1tD+PNwNIdskuors2Z8+6m Xqw4SUh8QklTTQ9y1ZigpnDq6TZFnehsuKUjDB7Rv1u6vVwMsRnwY8SBZQkkfuw2MI4A +4KRCMimTaDUruxckHi0PuGDig2L9czeYI+SmIC2Vf9zfbFQEEV886vYBPfCpkR92uje M4mgZqesGOnS6dsmWHgWwknoPrnGpOs0E8z1RXkvdnzg/OfuN0hrLs9ifZm5LT81516b hvA5m0AEO+cVxhIvZ+lv3ag+XAixCjsA1G/LLxIq5Zw1z7gvfm8WIDr0CL0IwDfXZjkS GOsg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfogjMFK604t7QjeinSXxHje+sCluxQqHT+lBkc25M2g077mFtMtb 79OaLGJORC8mn59/Yet6ver2h94cdn/NW2inxsVKPZXY
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV63/o+743N1mgY4pTCX2xpkQ3uxk8JSjnE5iBPYfSMvJIfJT4PwNxE12LLFKZ+zL4d/ZNRgNwrp4jsM0TJQVJX4=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:d988:: with SMTP id s8-v6mr6516400lfi.122.1539462286470; Sat, 13 Oct 2018 13:24:46 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2018 13:24:35 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmVDvb6t3rh3sZUHrsApfJRb9A8GCLxPCe9b=tcvZz6J3w@mail.gmail.com>
To: mpls-chairs@ietf.org
Cc: mpls@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000baf3ae057821fea6"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/xJS6Ucb3CV-jnenNDruiP0cmres>
Subject: [mpls] (no subject)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2018 20:24:51 -0000

Dear WG Chairs, et al.,
as the author of the BFD for Multipoint Networks over Point-to-Multi-Point
MPLS LSP (draft-mirsky-mpls-p2mp-bfd) I would like to ask you to consider
WG adoption call of the draft. The document addresses non-IP encapsulation
of p2mp BFD over MPLS LSP that may be useful if the overhead of IP,
particularly IPv6, encapsulation is the concern. The base specification of
BFD for Multipoint Networks is at this time in IESG LC.

Regards,
Greg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email