IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] working group adoption poll on draft-xu-mpls-sr-over-ip

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Tue, 10 July 2018 22:39 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CDC4130E6D; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 15:39:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PsXF9oAKqw7l; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 15:39:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta8.iomartmail.com (mta8.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.158]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7936F131059; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 15:39:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (vs2.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.123]) by mta8.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w6AMdIZL010386; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 23:39:18 +0100
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 443DC22044; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 23:39:18 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.248]) by vs2.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E55522042; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 23:39:18 +0100 (BST)
Received: from 950129200 (6.152.51.84.dyn.plus.net [84.51.152.6] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w6AMdGwo019953 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 10 Jul 2018 23:39:17 +0100
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: 'Loa Andersson' <loa@pi.nu>, mpls@ietf.org
Cc: mpls-chairs@ietf.org, draft-xu-mpls-sr-over-ip@ietf.org
References: <5f8b4fd3-0c48-33b0-7628-8ffede383457@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <5f8b4fd3-0c48-33b0-7628-8ffede383457@pi.nu>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 23:39:16 +0100
Message-ID: <07ed01d4189e$d61fba90$825f2fb0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQIY1/3PHeak+dfsjjpXn06Dk+Fn6aP/jGKQ
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Originating-IP: 84.51.152.6
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.0.1013-23960.003
X-TM-AS-Result: No--15.824-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--15.824-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.1013-23960.003
X-TMASE-Result: 10--15.824000-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: 1GZI+iG+Mtf3fZ+bzIHVnpmug812qIbz0X0X5dpeBd6abNoYojBQdkS2 jEkQIXjuZk3ki93OpLDlTQPFB5uwdiU7cVZWimBbM0pZiLPQITqVq+okl1rYD/2TbFr0CGODxUD TxL3vuSCDe20dnfNQxDo9au4PkVYUwyCE4EX8iMPmAId+2bAQwiH2Y0Xxk8nYf52xMDCseC7qZn iQsT2qvE1i8No7236cKBheri7ShrL51WNA1rE6twhWgIsZuXlPOhJ9m53n4aDM7zpEspqG/22tl hlM7JsUQx95p3GYmc9K9OwwWqIxvX5+IhhTDo3BnVTWWiNp+v8FcnqPYTPUh+dTjSOFC/vqo8WM kQWv6iV95l0nVeyiuEIhOWyY9/MAC24oEZ6SpSkj80Za3RRg8FJyPejYIsaFcpZ/oqK9ekHfU3l eKMXXcjq7qUKPvYryIdY9jOi4lTI=
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/xNwtYSqLPRtYAaggmDzE_4164G0>
Subject: Re: [mpls] working group adoption poll on draft-xu-mpls-sr-over-ip
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 22:39:24 -0000

Hi Loa,

Did we just get the last response to your IPR poll?

Anyway, as a co-author, I support WG adoption of this document. 

I believe the mechanism it describes is wanted by operators, already in a number
of implementation pipelines, and in scope for the WG.

Actually, I think the draft is already pretty well cooked. I hope we can get
some aggressive reviews in the next few months and then push it forward for
publication.

Thanks,
Adrian
--
"Tales from Beyond the Wood" my third book of fairy tales will be available from
me in Montreal

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mpls [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Loa Andersson
> Sent: 10 July 2018 19:44
> To: mpls@ietf.org
> Cc: mpls-chairs@ietf.org; draft-xu-mpls-sr-over-ip@ietf.org
> Subject: [mpls] working group adoption poll on draft-xu-mpls-sr-over-ip
> 
> Working Group,
> 
> This is to start a two week poll on adopting
> draft-xu-mpls-sr-over-ip-01
> as a MPLS working group document.
> 
> Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working
> group mailing list (mpls@ietf.org). Please give a technical
> motivation for your support/not support, especially if you think that
> the document should not be adopted as a working group document.
> 
> There is one IPR disclosure against this document.
> 
> The authors and contributors have all (with one exception) stated on the
> MPLS wg mailing list that they are unaware of any other IPRs than what
> has been disclosed to the IETF. The author that has not responded on the
> mailing list has sent his response directly to the working group chairs
> 
> The working group adoption poll ends July 31, 2018.
> 
> /Loa
> --
> 
> 
> Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu
> Senior MPLS Expert
> Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email